Quantcast
Channel: Matt Proctor - Christian Standard
Viewing all 75 articles
Browse latest View live

Interview with Matt Proctor

$
0
0

CS_Video_Proctor_JN1NACC President Matt Proctor reflects on the convention theme, the convention’s contribution, and his feelings about the future of our movement. See his interview with Editor Mark Taylor here.


A Conversation with Matt Proctor

$
0
0

Meet Our Contributing Editors: This month we talk with Ozark Christian College President Matt Proctor about the impact of a convention theme, the health of the churches in our fellowship, and the genius of the Restoration Movement.

Interview By Jennifer Johnson

Well, two big things have been part of your life this past year: the North American Christian Convention and your wife’s cancer. Of course, that’s in addition to your work leading Ozark Christian College. I want to talk about all of it—let’s start with the NACC. What have you discovered about our churches this past year?

Matt Proctor preaching on opening night at the 2013 North American Christian Convention in Louisville, Kentucky.

Matt Proctor preaching on opening night at the 2013 North American Christian Convention in Louisville, Kentucky.

It’s been an honor to serve as the North American president. The travel schedule took me to some new places, and I’m really encouraged by what I see. I visited lots of churches with a strong outreach mind-set that want to touch their communities with the love of Christ. I see a strong missions heart, people who want to know what God is doing around the world and how they can be part of it. I see preachers who have really embraced preaching and teaching through books of the Bible.

I would stack the leaders in our movement with the best anywhere. We also have a ton of healthy midsize churches. They may not be the ones making the headlines, but this year I was really encouraged by the ones I got to know.

Some folks worry we’re going to compromise on baptism or try to find the lowest common denominator with the Evangelical world, and I don’t find that to be true at all. If anything, in recent years I’ve seen a stronger emphasis on baptism. Honestly, I think some of our megachurches have waved that banner better than ever.

 

I’m sure you’ve been asked this question before—what led you to choose Revelation as this year’s NACC theme?

Two reasons. First, Revelation tells us we’re part of a bigger story. I studied the book with Dr. Robert Lowery and he turned my world upside down—which I think apocalypse is supposed to do. It set my imagination on fire to reenvision the world through Christ’s eyes. Sometimes we think our lives are so ordinary, and we forget we are all playing a part in an epic story.

We had an apologetics professor at Ozark who loved Star Wars. (He liked to say he was training “apolojedi.”) Every morning he would listen to the theme music to remind him that even though he was going off to do regular professor stuff—give lectures, meet with students, grade papers—he was actually part of this grand cosmic conflict with very high stakes, the battle for immortal human souls. And that’s what Revelation is meant to do. So I wanted people who were scared of the book to read it and, even if they didn’t understand every little detail, be able to reimagine their world and their lives as part of the grand salvation drama of the ages.

Second, Revelation tells us we’re part of a hopeful story. Everybody needs a strong dose of hope. Little did I know, of course, that the message of hope for suffering people was something I would need because of situations in my own family. Looking back on it, God was working upstream and he knew I was going to need to live with the message of Revelation this year.

 

When did you get the diagnosis that Katie had cancer? 

February 15 was the day the doctor dropped the cancer word on our family. She had been sick since the beginning of the year; still, that diagnosis was a punch in the gut. But I married a woman of faith, and we held onto the constancy and goodness of God. We knew that whatever happened, he was going to take care of our family.

 

Not that there’s ever a good time to face cancer, but this was not the year.

In a lot of ways it’s turned out better than I could have planned, because we needed the North American theme in our lives. The word victorious was all over our house because I had NACC displays and literature I carried with me everywhere, so we were constantly reminded that no matter what happened, we would win in the end.

And we are already surrounded by a great church family and college family, but because of my role this year we were also surrounded by the Christian church family, and literally thousands of people and hundreds of churches mentioned my wife’s name in prayer during that time. If there was ever a reminder of why the NACC is important as a way to connect us, this was it. We were overwhelmed and humbled.

I was scheduled to speak at a big teen convention the weekend after the diagnosis and couldn’t attend. All the teens at the convention signed a huge card and sent it to our house and it just blew our kids away. My son tweeted a picture of it and wrote, “I love the church.” My kids got to see the church at its best. I’ll forever be grateful for that.

 

How is Katie doing? 

We’re celebrating that at the moment Katie is cancer-free. She’ll have to take meds for the rest of her life because this particular cancer has a fairly high recurrence rate. There are some side effects, and there’s a new normal for us. But we’re so grateful for answered prayers, and we’re just going to trust God every day to keep leading us.

 

Everything else pales in comparison to that experience, but another unpleasant moment this year must have been that Business Insider article ranking Ozark as “not worth the money.”

I’m sure they were well-intentioned, and the issue of escalating costs in higher education is certainly a legitimate one. The point of the article was to compare the cost of a school’s education to the expected salary of a school’s graduates.

I think our cost is very reasonable. I think the average cost nationally of a four-year private college education is $36,000 a year, and we’re less than half that. But because we are a Bible college, unlike other schools on the list, the vast majority of our graduates go into ministry, which isn’t exactly a ticket to riches. So they are right that our graduates aren’t going to make as much as a graduate from, say, Harvard.

But I don’t think the effectiveness of our mission is measured by the size of a paycheck. Our effectiveness is measured by things like churches planted, Bibles translated, missionaries sent, marriages mended, children taught, teenagers mentored, and lives changed by the gospel. Our graduates get to see some paychecks more important than the ones you deposit in your bank account.

 

It’s part of a larger conversation we’re hearing more and more about the rising costs of college. The debt load is a real issue, especially for people in ministry. 

And it’s an important conversation to have. We try to operate really lean and stay pretty efficient so we can keep those costs down while offering a quality experience. I think of Bob Russell’s line—“excellence without extravagance.”

It’s always a balancing act because we want to provide a quality education, which means quality people. But when health insurance costs for our staff go up by 20 or 40 percent, that either gets paid for by gift income or by a raise in tuition.

We also encourage students to work hard and not just take out their maximum loans every semester, so they can leave school with the least amount of debt possible. And we’re continually trying to raise scholarship funds. That’s one of our development office’s main goals.

 

What’s going on at Ozark that you’re especially excited about? 

I’m really excited about our partnerships, like the one with Orchard Group. For the last few years we’ve sent students to New York City to take classes, visit church plants, and explore urban church planting. Some of the kids who participate in this will become church planters and some will become leaders who have a heart for church planting. A few recent grads are planting in Japan and having amazing success—that’s a direct result of this program.

We’re in discussions with Christ In Youth and Good News Productions about partnering to train students in media and storytelling and using those tools for gospel work.

We also started a new BA in Biblical Justice this fall. The name is intentional—we’re taking a biblical approach that means caring for the whole person, body and soul. We’re partnering with some churches like Southland Christian in Lexington that are doing a great job combining evangelism and compassion ministries.

 

I love the way we work together. All of these good things for your students are happening because our churches and parachurches are working with you.

It’s the genius of the Restoration Movement. We call ourselves “independent Christian churches” but actually we’re interdependent. Even though we have more than 5,000 congregations, it just feels like a small town because everywhere I go I meet someone who knows someone I know.

I also love how nimble we are, because we can respond to needs without the bureaucracy. So many of our organizations began because someone saw the need, had the freedom to take the initiative, and worked with others to make something happen.

One of my goals this year was to really wave the banner with the younger generation, not just for the NACC but for our movement. So I tried to get into as many of our colleges as I could and share the value of staying connected, because ours is a great family to be part of. I love our tribe.

 

Jennifer Johnson, herself one of CHRISTIAN STANDARD’s contributing editors, is a writer living in Levittown, Pennsylvania.

Victorious: The theme needed most by the president

$
0
0
Matt and Katie Proctor and their six children, each wearing a “Cancer is bad, but God is good” T-shirt, thank worshippers in the opening-night NACC crowd for their prayers in the months that have followed Katie’s February cancer diagnosis.

Matt and Katie Proctor and their six children, each wearing a “Cancer is bad, but God is good” T-shirt, thank worshippers in the opening-night NACC crowd for their prayers in the months that have followed Katie’s February cancer diagnosis.

By Darrel Rowland

The February weekend Matt Proctor found out his wife, Katie, had cancer was filled with tears, fears, and scary portents.

The Sunday morning lesson he had to teach didn’t help; it was on Ruth and Naomi, both widowed when their spouses died.

Emotionally wrung out by Sunday night, he suggested his kids pick out a movie and they would all gather downstairs and watch it together.

The choice was the Disney-Pixar animated film Up.

Within the first few minutes of the movie, the husband loses his wife.

“I had tears rolling down my cheeks,” Proctor says.

Less than five months before he was supposed to preside over a North American Christian Convention with the theme of “Victorious,” Proctor didn’t know whether his wife would still be around to accompany him and their six children.

“I was just watching the movie thinking, What if? What if I do lose Katie and I have to raise these kids on my own? And who knows what will happen if this happens quickly with the convention? There were a lot of those question marks that swirl around in your head.”

The most important of those questions was answered following Katie’s surgery in April. As the family movingly proclaimed on the convention’s opening night—with help from T-shirts and signs designed by Katie—doctors have proclaimed they can find no evidence of cancer.

“Here’s what I came to say in a sentence: Never, ever, ever un-derestimate Jesus,” he told a crowd that included many a wet eye.

Could the cancer have struck at a worse time, with Proctor not only preparing for the convention but busy with his “day job” as president of Ozark Christian College in Joplin, Missouri, along with teaching and speaking engagements?

That’s not how Proctor sees it.

“Honestly, I couldn’t think of a better year if it was going to happen. Because we were not only surrounded by our family and the college family and our own church family, but because of this role as president of the North American, we were literally surrounded by family that was nationwide and worldwide,” he says.

“To be honest, as hard as these months have been, there’ve been a lot of blessings in it. My kids have been able to see the church at its best . . . And you can’t put a price tag on that.”

Darrel Rowland is public affairs editor of The Columbus Dispatch and an adult Bible fellowship teacher with Worthington (Ohio) Christian Church.

‘Happy Incarnation Day’

$
0
0

12_Proctor_JNBy Matt Proctor

Your theology of the incarnation matters. It affects how you view your body, your
problems, your ministry—and your celebration of the holiday before us.

Your theology of the incarnation matters.

Santa Claus thought so. Saint Nicholas, the bishop of Myra in Asia Minor in the early fourth century, is the historical basis for the Santa myth. Born to a wealthy family, Nicholas used his entire inheritance to help the poor, sick, and children in need. Stories of Saint Nick describe him saving young women from slavery, providing grain in a famine, and sparing innocents from execution. It’s not hard to see why he was revered as a kind and generous soul.

But Nicholas also cared deeply about Christian doctrine. In AD 325, he attended the pivotal Council of Nicaea, a gathering of church leaders from throughout the Roman Empire to address the Arian heresy. Arius, a teacher of great influence, insisted that Jesus was a created being and not fully God. Nicholas strongly disagreed, and during the council meeting, one tradition tells us Nicholas and Arius got into a heated debate on the nature of the incarnation and the full deity of Christ. However, the debate ended suddenly when Nicholas punched out Arius right there on the floor of the council!

That’s right. Santa Claus punched a heretic.

Maybe we shouldn’t call him “jolly old Saint Nick” any more.

While his conflict resolution methods may have needed improvement, one thing you must admire: Nicholas was passionate about doctrinal orthodoxy. He believed your theology of the incarnation matters.

Usain Bolt in a Three-Legged Race
So here’s a theology of the incarnation in a nutshell: “In Christ all the fullness of the Deity lives in bodily form” (Colossians 2:9). Jesus of Nazareth was fully God and fully man. The second person of the Trinity—who has existed eternally—entered history as a human baby one night in Bethlehem. In meditating on this mystery, we should avoid two mistakes.

On one hand, we should not think, by becoming human, Jesus became something less than God. Sometimes Philippians 2:6 and 7 are misunderstood to mean Jesus emptied himself of his deity. A better understanding: Jesus did not empty himself of his God-nature, but he did empty himself of some of his God-privileges during his time on earth.

If Olympic gold medalist Usain Bolt entered a three-legged race—running with one leg tied to a partner’s leg—it wouldn’t diminish his innate running ability or change his status as the world’s fastest sprinter. But he would certainly be voluntarily limiting the use of his abilities. Likewise, Jesus’ status as fully God was not diminished in the incarnation. He did limit his omnipresence by taking on a human body. He limited his omniscience by experiencing normal human growth—including a gradually growing intellect and consciousness (Luke 2:52).

But Jesus did not surrender his “God-ness.” Theologian Millard Erickson says, “The incarnation was more an addition of human attributes than a loss of divine attributes.” The second person of the Trinity was fully God for all eternity past, was still fully God when he took on a physical body and a human name, and remains fully God today, having returned to his Father’s right hand (John 1:1; Acts 7:56).

The Only One to Taste Full Humanity
On the other hand, we should avoid the mistake of thinking that, because he was God, Jesus couldn’t have been really and truly, fully human. The Gospels paint the picture of a Jesus who got hungry, thirsty, and tired. He got callouses, blew his nose, and instinctively rubbed his bug bites. He bled when he got cut, and he wrestled with all the powerful emotions of the human experience. He felt joy, sorrow, affection, anger, compassion, astonishment, loneliness, distress, and grief. (See John 15:11; Matthew 26:37; John 11:33; Mark 3:5; Matthew 9:36; Luke 7:9; Mark 15:34; Luke 12:50; and John 11:35.)

One scholar, A. E. Taylor, contends Jesus couldn’t have been fully human because he never sinned. Hebrews 4:15 tells us Jesus “has been tempted in every way, just as we are—yet he did not sin.” But Taylor casts doubt on the genuineness of Jesus’ temptations: “If a man does not commit certain transgressions . . . it must be because he never felt the appeal of them.”1

But Leon Morris argues that the reverse of Taylor’s assertion is true. Because of his sinlessness, Jesus felt a more intense temptation, not a less intense one. “The man who yields to a particular temptation has not felt its full power. He has given in while the temptation has yet something in reserve. Only the man who does not yield to a temptation, who as regards that particular temptation is sinless, knows the full extent of that temptation.”2

Jesus was the one who withstood the temptation that Adam could not; it was he who finally lived out God’s original intention for mankind. So the question, then, is not, “Was Jesus fully human?” The question is, “Are we fully human?” The answer, of course, is that we are fallen, a broken version of God’s original design. Ironically, only the one who was fully God has tasted what it means to be fully human. Jesus knew the human experience better than any previous human.

Meaning to the Cross
It is the incarnation that gives meaning to the cross. Without the doctrine of the incarnation, Jesus’ death on the cross would either be unable to atone for sins (if Jesus weren’t fully God) or unavailable to apply to mankind (if Jesus weren’t fully human). The cross has significance only because Jesus was both fully divine (his sacrifice is powerful enough to save) and fully human (his sacrifice is pertinent enough to apply to us). Because he was God, the cross is redemptive. Because he was man, the cross is relevant.

Saint Nicholas was right: your theology of the incarnation matters.

“Happy Incarnation Day”
Perhaps it matters more than we know.

I know a Bible college professor who—instead of offering a “Happy Holidays” or even a “Merry Christmas”—made his December greeting every year a cheery, “Happy Incarnation Day!” Yes, people looked at him weird, but I loved it. He wanted to encourage people to do more than simply nod in Jesus’ direction. He wanted them to actually reflect on the central doctrine of Christmas—the incarnation.

These days, Christmas seems to be a holiday aimed more at the heart than the head. The weeks leading up to December 25 are filled with sentimental images, warm emotions, and caroling services—not doctrinal discussions. But during this holiday season, in addition to feeling grateful about the incarnation, we would also be wise to think carefully about the incarnation.

Specifically this: we know the theological implications of this doctrine, but are there other, more practical, implications of a God-who-came-in-the-flesh? Could our theology of the incarnation shape more than just our understanding of salvation? Let me suggest how the incarnation can inform many other areas of life.

Our Physical Bodies Are Essential to Our Humanity
When the Word became flesh, he demonstrated that our physical bodies are an essential part of our humanity. We are a strange mixture of physical and spiritual, a weird alchemy of material and immaterial, an inseparable combination of body and soul. We are inextricably intermixed, and as someone said, “The body and soul live so close to each other that they catch each other’s diseases.”

That’s true: when our bodies experience fatigue or sickness, it can affect our soul’s outlook. When our souls are troubled, our bodies might manifest the distress in ulcers, headaches, or high blood pressure. The reverse is also true: when our bodies are healthy, it can lighten our spirit. When our soul is full, we might not even notice weariness or fatigue. (By the way, this psychosomatic human nature means we would be wise to try different bodily postures in prayer because they can actually affect our spirit’s attitude.)

In fact, our physical bodies not only affect our spirits, they can affect other’s spirits. In a famous study of interpersonal communication, psychologist Albert Mehrabian discovered we decide how we feel about a speaker based largely on physical—not verbal—cues. He said 7 percent of a speaker’s emotional impact comes from the words he says, 38 percent comes from tone of voice, and 55 percent comes from facial expressions and bodily posture.

All of which is to say: when God wanted to demonstrate his love for us, he chose to do so by taking on a body. Jesus looked directly at people, touched people, held children in his arms, and used his physical frame to communicate God’s care and compassion.

Ministry Is Best Done in Person
Given our amazing communication capabilities in this high-tech chapter of world history, it’s interesting to note that Jesus chose to enter history in a low-tech, high-touch chapter. He could’ve decided to be born at a time with the advantages of television, radio, the Internet, Facebook, and Twitter. (Although I can hear him now, “That’s not what I meant when I said, ‘Follow me.’”) It seems he would’ve been able to spread the message of the kingdom much more quickly.

But instead, he chose to step into world history at a time when he had to physically talk to every person who would hear his message, to physically touch the individuals who needed his healing, to physically walk to every ministry location. Japanese theologian Kosuke Koyama entitled his book Three Mile an Hour God because Jesus entered time when the chief mode of transportation was walking, and our average walking speed is three miles an hour.

In choosing the moment of his historical appearance, Jesus was deciding his ministry would have to live within the time and space limits of his physical body. When he wanted to “multiply his ministry,” he did not choose to do so through leveraged technology. Instead, he chose to do so by being physically present with 12 disciples, preparing them in person to carry his message to the places he could not bodily go. His incarnation carries this implication: ministry happens best in person.

I know a preacher who, rather than making a personal visit, texted his condolences to a grieving family. Please hear me: I myself text, tweet, and Skype. I am no Luddite, and I believe the “dominion” mandate in Genesis 1:28 includes harnessing technology for good. But if I ever catch one of my students texting a family in a funeral home when he could’ve made a personal visit, I will track him down and revoke his diploma.

The fact is, we are embodied beings, and there is something about being physically present with another person that communicates the greatest attention. Often the greatest moment of ministry is the three mile an hour act of simply walking in someone’s door. Every minister knows when folks express gratitude for their preacher’s care in the midst of a crisis, they usually don’t say, “Thank you for your wise words.” Instead they say, “Thanks for being there.”

So in a day of DVD sermons in church and youth group devotions on Twitter (which can be good things), the incarnation reminds us that the personal touch matters. If I can call someone instead of e-mailing, I will. If I can have a face-to-face conversation instead of picking up the phone, I will. The more personal the ministry, the better.

Christ Understands Our Fallen World Struggles
Indeed, a personal visit from another person is a way of entering into their experience. When the young priest Ezekiel arrived in Babylon to preach to the Israelite captives there, he did not walk in and immediately start sermonizing. Instead, he “sat among them for seven days—deeply distressed” (3:15). Ezekiel was wise enough to know that the exiled Israelites would hear him better if he took the time to enter their pain. He identified with them.

The incarnation was God’s way of “sitting among us” and feeling our struggles in a fallen world. Hebrews 4:15 tells us, “We do not have a high priest who is unable to empathize with our weaknesses.” When you encounter painful trials, Jesus understands. Because Jesus experienced the same kinds of physical, emotional, and spiritual tribulations as we do, he can be the very best pastor for your soul.

When my boys were younger, they loved it when I would dress like them. After 5-year-old Carl and 3-year-old Conrad would put on jeans and a blue T-shirt, they’d come ask me to wear jeans and a blue T-shirt. When I did, they had a saying. They would survey me, survey themselves, and say, “Look, Dad: same, same.” For my birthday, Carl bought me a North Carolina blue mesh shirt . . . because he had a North Carolina blue mesh shirt. We could be “same, same.”

When I played living room football with my boys, Conrad would not let me play standing—so big and scary and towering above him. The theological term for this is “completely other.” Instead he insisted I get on my knees. When I was down at eye level, Conrad would put his hand on my shoulder and say, “There. See, Dad—same, same.” They liked it when I entered their world. (To be honest, it’s not that hard because I mostly do life at a grade-school level. When I laugh like a fourth-grader at my little boys’ burping, my wife shakes her head and mutters, “Same, same”).

One time I scraped my leg working on my house. When Conrad fell down and scraped his leg, he pointed at my scab, then showed me his and said, “Hey, Dad—same, same.” Here’s the point: in the incarnation, God chose not to stay “completely other.” He got down at eye level and experienced what it’s like to be tired and discouraged, to feel abandoned and betrayed. He knows what it’s like to hurt and bleed.

In your pain, you may be tempted to say, “Jesus, you have no idea what I’m going through. You have no idea how bad I’m hurting.” But Christ can respond, “Yes, I do.” He can point to your wounds and then to his own and say, “Look: same, same. Me too. I have entered your world, and I know how you feel. I have been there, I am with you now, I care, and I can help.”

Wow.

Your theology of the God-who-became-flesh can quite literally be life changing. Meditating on the implications of the God-man can shape your ministry and feed your soul. So this holiday season, don’t risk the wrath of Saint Nicholas. In the midst of all the warm feelings, take time to think deeply and think well on the central doctrine of Christmas.
Happy Incarnation Day!
________

1A. E. Taylor, Asking Them Questions, ed. Ronald Selby Wright (London: Oxford University Press, 1936), 94.

2Leon Morris, The Lord from Heaven (Downer’s Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1974), 51, 52.

Matt Proctor serves as president at Ozark Christian College, Joplin, Missouri. He also served as president of the 2013 North American Christian Convention.

Should Women Preach? (The Story of One Bible College Faculty’s Quest for an Answer)

$
0
0

By Matt Proctor

In the book Children’s Letters to God, one young girl wrote: “Dear God, are boys better than girls? I know you are one, but try to be fair.” It’s an age-old question: what does God think about women and, specifically, women’s roles in the church?

It’s also a controversial question. The April 2013 article “Women Preaching” generated more comments on CHRISTIAN STANDARD’s website than any other article last year. The article mentioned that Ozark Christian College offers a preaching class for women, and some readers wondered about the biblical rationale for such a class. (By the way, I’m grateful for all who want to hold our Restoration Movement colleges accountable. May their tribe increase.)

After all, in 1 Timothy 2:12, Paul says, “I do not permit a woman to teach or to assume authority over a man.” Are we (I use we because I am president of OCC) simply disregarding this text from God’s Word? If we are a true Bible college—teaching what the Bible teaches, prohibiting what the Bible prohibits, and allowing what the Bible allows—then what possible scriptural warrant is there for a women’s preaching class?

To answer that question, let me tell you a story.

Ten years ago, the OCC faculty used its weekly faculty meetings for an entire semester to study the biblical teaching on women’s roles in the church. Together we surveyed Scripture and exegeted the key New Testament passages. Our goal was to set political correctness and cultural pressures aside and to simply let God’s Word have its say on this important subject.

We wanted to follow wise hermeneutical principles in our study. We employed the principle of harmony, which reminded us not to interpret any text in isolation. Rather, we sought to interpret each particular Scripture in light of all of Scripture. God’s Word does not contradict itself, so we sought to harmonize the Bible’s teachings.

Our journey was also guided by the principle of history, which reminded us that God’s eternal commands were communicated in specific historical contexts. A text cannot mean what it never meant, so we sought to hear the Bible’s words as the first readers would have. As we understood the original historical-grammatical context, we would understand the Word of God.

Finally, we wanted to follow the principle of humility. This principle simply reminded us that, while God’s Word is absolutely authoritative, my particular interpretation of it is not. We are fallible human beings, and we are wise to at least entertain the possibility that our understanding of Scripture might be wrong. We must allow for our minds to be changed if our study of the Bible leads us to a different place than where we started. This is true submission to God.

 

So What Does the Rest of the Bible Actually Say?

With those guidelines in place, Ozark faculty members began their exegetical journey. We wanted to obey 1 Timothy 2:12. But to understand what it was (and wasn’t) saying, we needed to look at the rest of Scripture’s teaching on women’s leadership.

03_Proctor_JNIn the Old Testament, primary leadership of God’s people was reserved for men. All the priests were men; every published prophet was a man. However, on occasion, women did have a leadership role among God’s people. Women, such as Miriam (Exodus 15:20, 21) and the ladies in the choir (1 Chronicles 25:5, 6; Ezra 2:65; Nehemiah 7:67) helped lead worship. Deborah served as both a judge and a prophetess (Judges 4:4). Miriam, Huldah (2 Kings 22:14), and Isaiah’s wife (Isaiah 8:3) were also called prophetesses.

How about in the New Testament? In the Bible’s last 27 books, it again seemed clear that men were the primary leaders of God’s people. All 12 apostles were men; church elders were described as men. In fact, 1 Timothy 2:12, 13 grounded this in the doctrine of creation itself. Adam was formed first, says Paul, as God’s way of hard-wiring male leadership into his created order.

The New Testament often showed us women involved in nonleadership works of service—Martha feeding Jesus and his disciples (Luke 10:40), Tabitha (Dorcas) making coats for widows (Acts 9:39), Nympha hosting a church in her home (Colossians 4:15). One wag noted that if the wise men of Matthew 2 had instead been wise women, they would have asked directions, arrived on time, helped deliver the baby, cleaned the stable, made a casserole, and brought practical gifts like diapers! This much was certain: like the Mary mentioned in Romans 16:6, women “worked very hard” in the church’s behind-the-scenes labors.

But we also saw women’s gifts deployed in occasional proclamation and ministry leadership roles. After Jesus’ resurrection, God chose women to be the first bearers of the Easter message, as Mary and Mary Magdalene announced it to the apostles (Matthew 28:1, 7). Anna was called a prophetess (Luke 2:36), as were Philip’s four daughters (Acts 21:8, 9). Phoebe was called a deacon (Romans 16:1), and Romans 16:7 seemed to call Junia an “apostle”—in the broader, general sense of “missionary” or “one sent out” like Barnabas (Acts 14:14) and Epaphroditus (Philippians 2:25). Priscilla, with her husband Aquila, taught Apollos privately (Acts 18:26), and we heard Paul saying that Euodia and Syntyche somehow “contended at my side in the cause of the gospel” (Philippians 4:2, 3).

So far, then, the Bible seemed to be painting a picture of ongoing, regular male leadership—sprinkled with rarer moments of occasional female leadership—among God’s people.

 

An Often Overlooked Text

But as our faculty study continued, the question remained: what about women preaching? Doesn’t 1 Timothy 2:12 say that a woman is not to teach a man? Clearly a woman may teach a man in private, as Priscilla did with Apollos, so 1 Timothy 2:12 must instead mean that a woman may not teach a man publicly in the church assembly, right?

It is certainly true that 1 Timothy 2 is about the public worship service. However, an often-overlooked text clarified our understanding of that passage.

In 1 Corinthians 11:5, Paul tells us that women prophesied in the New Testament church’s worship assembly. Important note: as you may know, prophesying in Scripture was more proclamation than prediction. While it might include foretelling, more often prophesying meant forthtelling God’s message to God’s people.1 In other words, it was much like what we call preaching today.

First Corinthians 11 was telling us that, in the first-century culture, a woman who prophesied in church should keep her head covered, indicating an attitude of submission to the church’s male leaders. The implication was clear: a woman is allowed, in a posture of humble followership, to prophesy in the church’s assembly. She can share a message from God, even with the men present.

Since the Bible doesn’t contradict itself, this understanding of 1 Corinthians 11 led us as a faculty to believe that, whatever 1 Timothy 2 was teaching, it must not be teaching that women can never on any occasion speak or proclaim God’s message in church. Otherwise Paul would be prohibiting in the 1 Timothy text what he allows in the 1 Corinthians 11 text.2

By the way, we couldn’t help thinking of the Day of Pentecost. What text did Peter use for the very first Christian sermon? He quoted Joel 2 to talk about the Spirit’s new indwelling presence among Christ’s followers, “In the last days, God says, I will pour out my Spirit on all people. Your sons and daughters will prophesy” (Acts 2:17).

But if the church’s daughters can prophesy/preach, then what exactly was Paul prohibiting in 1 Timothy 2:12?

 

A Critical Clue in the Grammar

At this point, we as a faculty moved from the principle of harmony (what does the rest of the Bible say?) to the principle of history (how would the original readers have understood this?).

I once had a preaching professor who said that Greek in a sermon should be like underwear: it should provide good support but you shouldn’t let it show! Pardon me for letting some Greek show, but it’s important because God communicated his eternal truth in normal human grammar that can be analyzed and comprehended. Understanding the biblical grammar helps us understand the biblical God. So hang with me here.

The original readers of 1 Timothy, of course, spoke Greek, and when Paul wrote 1 Timothy 2:12, he chose a very specific Greek grammatical construction. The phrase “to teach” (didaskein in Greek) is a present tense infinitive instead of an aorist tense infinitive.3 The aorist tense is a close-up photographic snapshot of an action, picturing as little as one particular occurrence. The present tense is a wide-angle movie camera shot of an action, picturing a continuous, habitual, ongoing condition—a state of being.

For example, “to believe” (aorist) means to exercise faith on a given occasion, while “to believe” (present) means to be a believer. “To serve” (aorist) means to perform an act of service, while “to serve” (present) means to be a servant. “To sin” (aorist) means to commit a particular sin, while “to sin” (present) means to be a sinner.4

So “to teach” (aorist) means to teach on a given occasion, while “to teach” (present) means to be a teacher. When Paul says in 1 Timothy 2:12 that he does not permit a woman “to teach” (present), he is not saying she can never teach on any given occasion in church. Instead, he is saying that a woman should not be the continuous, ongoing, habitual teacher. That’s the implication of the Greek grammar, and it’s reasonable to believe this is how the original readers would’ve understood it.

 

A Conclusion to Our Exegetical Journey

This raised a question: who are the continuous, ongoing, habitual teachers for the congregation? The answer is in the immediately following context of 1 Timothy. Just a few verses later, Paul tells us that the elders are the teachers. (Elders are men “able to teach” in 1 Timothy 3:2.) They are the recognized, authoritative, the-buck-stops-here teachers. So from the context, it would seem that when Paul says he “does not allow a woman to teach or have authority over a man,” he is saying that he does not allow women to be elders.

By the way, the description in the New Testament that best fits what we call the “preacher” of a church is the elder who is paid to preach and teach (1 Timothy 5:17). So if a modern-day “preacher” is a preaching-teaching elder, then it would seem that 1 Timothy 2:12 prohibits women from being the preacher of a local congregation.

All of this certainly squared with our survey of the Old Testament: ongoing, regular male leadership—sprinkled with rarer moments of occasional female leadership—among God’s people. So as a faculty, after our study of Scripture, we came to these conclusions:

1. Beginning with creation, God has hard-wired male spiritual leadership into the system, and God is calling men to step up as the primary leaders in his church.

2. The regular teachers and leaders in any congregation, then, are to be the elders—a role reserved for men. This includes the role of “the preacher” in a local church.

3. The New Testament does also allow for women, on occasion, to preach and teach in church—from a posture of submission to the elders’ ultimate authority.

 

Don’t Miss the Most Important Fact

As a college under the authority of Scripture, we want to prohibit what the Bible prohibits and allow what the Bible allows. So, yes, in our curriculum at Ozark Christian College, we have a preaching class for women—but not because we believe women should be the preacher of a local church. Rather, it’s because we believe that when women have opportunity to preach and teach on occasion (as the Bible seems to allow), they should be prepared to do their best for God’s glory and the church’s good.

In all the talk about women preaching, don’t miss this important fact: women are also gifted and called to serve in many significant ways in the church’s life that are not “up-front” ministry. These should be honored and celebrated, because God-given gender roles are not meant to be competitive but complementary. We’re all wearing the same jersey, and God never intended to leave the female half of his team sitting on the bench. He wants them in the game because we have a world to win.

As Jesus said, “The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few” (Matthew 9:37). The evangelistic need is so great that the Lord calls all hands on deck, ready to work, without squabbling about who gets to do what. Let’s equip every available person—man and woman—in every biblically possible way to share the good news with a lost world. I think Kay Moll put it best when she said, “I am not so concerned about the role of women as I am the cause of Christ.”

________

 

1“Less than 2 percent of Old Testament prophecy is messianic. Less than 5 percent specifically describes the New Covenant age. Less than 1 percent concerns (end times) events.” Gordon Fee and Douglas Stuart, How to Read the Bible for All It’s Worth (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1981), 150.

2In 1 Corinthians 14:34, Paul says, “Women should remain silent in the churches.” But just a few chapters before, in 1 Corinthians 11, he had clearly made allowance for women to prophesy in church! Is he contradicting himself? No. The context of 1 Corinthians 14 would indicate he is excluding women from the authoritative teaching function of weighing prophecy in the assembly, not excluding them from uttering prophecy in the assembly. Weighing prophecy, it would seem, is likely reserved for the elders . . . who, as we shall see, are to be men. See D.A. Carson’s chapter in Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood: A Response to Evangelical Feminism, eds. John Piper and Wayne Grudem (Wheaton: Crossway, 1991).

3“To have authority” in 1 Timothy 2:12 is also a present tense infinitive.

4Kenneth Wuest, The Pastoral Epistles in the Greek New Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1958), 48.

 

Matt Proctor is president of Ozark Christian College, Joplin, Missouri, and a CHRISTIAN STANDARD contributing editor.

________

‘Humility: The Bookends of Bible Study’

Alexander Campbell taught that a Bible student can come within “understanding distance” of God’s Word—Scripture’s meaning really can be grasped—but that no one stands perfectly in the center of that “circle of understanding” except God himself. None of us is an infallible interpreter. All of us must practice the hermeneutical principle of humility.

Mark Scott, former academic dean at Ozark Christian College, put it this way, “Humility bookends the hermeneutical task.” We begin and end our study in humility. That’s why we constantly revisit our exegesis and thinking. That’s why we never give in to the belief that we have hermeneutically “arrived,” and that’s why Scott once said, “In all my years of studying the Bible, I cannot remember a year that I did not, at some point, say, ‘I guess I was wrong about that.’” 

As a college faculty, our exegetical journey led us to an understanding that seemed faithful to all the biblical texts. However, we knew that other intelligent, orthodox, Jesus-loving, Bible-believing Christians had come to different conclusions. This gave us an opportunity to practice a core Restoration Movement principle: “In essentials, unity; in nonessentials, liberty; in all things, love.”

While important, women’s roles in the church did not seem to be an essential of the faith. Since it was not a test of salvation, it would not become a test of fellowship. We would not label as liberals those who understood the Bible more permissively. Nor would we label as legalists those who saw women’s roles more prohibitively. 

Instead, we would listen to those who disagreed with us to see if our understanding could be improved. We would practice the principle of humility, and we would “in all things” love and respect our brothers and sisters in Christ.

—M.P.

Intentional About Intentions

$
0
0
Katie and Matt Proctor

Katie and Matt Proctor

By Matt Proctor

(From our series “The Best or Worst Advice I’ve Ever Received.”)

I worked for a time at Southeast Christian Church in Louisville, Kentucky, and in a talk with church staff, senior minister Bob Russell once described the inevitability of conflict, “We’re not always going to get along. Someone said, ‘Where two or three are gathered in my name . . . there’s going to be an argument.’” He then pointed out the human tendency, in the midst of conflict, to suspect the worst about the other person. We assume their motives are malicious, or at least less-than-trustworthy. So Bob gave the staff a simple guideline for maintaining a healthy relational culture: “Trust good intentions.”

This advice has served me well in Christian leadership. When someone’s behavior is frustrating, I try to remember not to “mind read” their motives. If an employee critiques a decision I’ve made, I’ll be wise if I avoid labeling him “negative,” and instead believe he spoke because he cares about the college’s effectiveness. If a Christian brother disagrees strongly with my understanding of Scripture, I try not to brand him a “legalist,” but to instead appreciate what I assume is a desire to honor God’s Word. When my wife points out my faults, I’m learning to trust she’s not intentionally trying to hurt me, but instead trying to make me a better man. (Good luck with that, Katie.)

I’ve led long enough to know that, on occasion, a few people don’t have good intentions. But on the whole, “trusting good intentions” has kept me from interpreting people through my pain or frustration, from seeing their actions through an unfairly negative lens, and from responding out of fear or anger. In the midst of conflict, it has helped me to listen better, understand people more accurately, practice kindness more often, and learn more from what others have to say—however hard it may be to hear.

Where two or three are gathered in my name . . . trust good intentions.

Matt Proctor serves as president of Ozark Christian College.

The Lego Principle

$
0
0

By Matt Proctor

Several years ago, two of my nephews accompanied their mom on a visit to a friend’s house. Ben was 8. Brian was 6. Their mother’s friend was a very neat lady, to the point of being obsessive-compulsive. (I have a friend who says, “I have OCD, only I like to call it CDO because then it’s in alphabetical order.”) This woman had a place for everything and everything in its place. Though childless, she did have a few toys and handed Ben and Brian a bucket of Lego bricks: “Here boys, you can play with these.”

What’s the first thing they did with that bucket? Like all red-blooded American boys, they dumped out the contents. Their mother’s uptight friend immediately went into full clean-freak mode. She dropped to her knees and started scooping the Lego pieces back into the bucket with these words: “No, no, no, boys. What I meant was, you can play with these . . . one at a time.”

What?

You can’t play with one Lego at a time! A Lego piece’s whole purpose is to be combined with other pieces. A Lego piece is created to be part of a group, something bigger than itself. A solitary Lego can never fulfill its destiny. Lego pieces were made to be connected.

 

The Lego Principle

You don’t have to read far into your Bible to discover that human beings were created to be combined with other human beings. Call it the Lego Principle: human beings were made to be connected. As Christians, we do this within the church and also among the churches. A local church is created to be part of something bigger than itself, and if we are called to “make disciples of all nations,” then a solitary congregation will not fulfill that destiny all on its own.

Throughout the New Testament, examples abound of local congregations working together to accomplish God’s purposes. Local churches listened to the stories of other congregations (1 Thessalonians 1:7, 8), shared Bible teachers and teaching resources (Acts 8:14; Colossians 4:16), joined offerings together in benevolence work (Romans 15:26), discussed issues together that threatened their doctrinal unity and evangelistic message (Acts 15:1-35), cooperated in missionary efforts, and even formed a mission team with folks from five different congregations (Acts 20:4).

While the New Testament churches did not form a multicongregational leadership structure—no denominational hierarchy—we do see these congregations coming together to carry out ministry. They were clearly and closely connected, just as Lego pieces should be.

 

The Genius of the Restoration Movement

I grew up in a Christian church, and my parents explained that we were a nondenominational church, autonomous and independent. But I also learned we were part of a fellowship of other like-minded congregations—something called the Restoration Movement—and even as a kid, I saw the evidence of our partnership together.

For example, I went to a Christian camp supported by several regional Christian churches. Every Sunday, I read in Christian Standard magazine about other churches in our fellowship nationwide. (Yes, as a fifth-grader, I was reading the Christian Standard. I was a geeky kid.) I had a little blue fish bank that collected money for IDES—a disaster benevolence ministry started by our group of churches. I attended the North American Christian Convention and Christ In Youth conferences with folks from other Christian churches. In all of these, I saw a group of independent churches that were also interdependent.

That, to me, is part of the genius of the Restoration Movement.

Don’t get me wrong: I love the simple doctrinal emphases of our group of churches. I love our desire to be faithful to God’s Word above all—to do Bible things in Bible ways—and I resonate with slogans like “No creed but Christ, no book but the Bible.” May we never lose the heart of the “Restoration plea.”

But what I especially love about our movement is our strong relational commitment. We talk about our group of churches as a “brotherhood,” and that’s really true. There are roughly 1.5 million folks in the 5,000 or 6,000 independent Christian churches. But our large group feels more like a small town, where everybody is somehow related to everybody else.

I get to travel to many of our churches, and no matter which congregation I’m visiting, one thing I’ve learned: somebody always knows somebody I know. I can’t prove that the “six degrees of separation” theory is true worldwide, but I’m pretty sure it’s true in our movement.

Just like Lego pieces, we’re all connected.

In fact, the “culture” in our group of churches is less like a business and more like a family. Things like accountability and encouragement and idea-sharing and strategic partnerships happen because of organic connections, not because of an organizational flow chart. They don’t flow along lines of authority, as they might in a denominational structure, but along relational lines, like in a family. Like most families, we can be a little messy and disorganized. We’re sure not perfect. But the “culture” in our group is more healthy than not, and like the New Testament churches, we’ve shown we can work together fairly well.

 

An Example from One Christian College

At Ozark Christian College, we strive to work together with the rest of our “family.” We’ve cultivated connections with churches and other ministries to more effectively train the next generation of kingdom leaders:

Ozark Christian College’s ministry majors can earn their final 30 credit hours in an intensive yearlong leadership residency with Christ’s Church of the Valley in Peoria, Arizona, under the leadership of Don Wilson and Dr. Mark Moore.

Ozark Christian College’s ministry majors can earn their final 30 credit hours in an intensive yearlong leadership residency with Christ’s Church of the Valley in Peoria, Arizona, under the leadership of Don Wilson and Dr. Mark Moore.

• Our partnership with The Orchard Group allows our church planting students to travel to New York City and San Francisco every semester to visit thriving urban church plants and receive frontline training from experienced practitioners.

• Our partnership with Christ In Youth—our next-door neighbor in Joplin—allows our worship majors to earn credit hours in a residency traveling with CIY, learning about leading-edge worship production at their youth events.

Good News Productions International, another Joplin neighbor, allows our worship tech majors to earn credit in a residency, learning about videography and scriptwriting, visual storytelling and editing. GNPI is a ministry that has produced video resources seen by millions.

• Our partnership with Southland Christian Church in Lexington, Kentucky, allows our preaching students to visit the church and sit in on the creative sermon planning meetings with senior minister Jon Weece and his team.

Southland Christian Church is also a leader in ministry to the marginalized—including programs like Refuge clinics that offer dental and medical care to the uninsured in their community. Our biblical justice majors visit Lexington to see what these in-the-trenches ministries look like firsthand.

• Our preaching students in the leadership and preaching seminar take a weekend trip to Crossroads Christian Church in Newburgh, Indiana, to learn from senior minister Ken Idleman, then travel on to Southeast Christian Church in Louisville, Kentucky, to interact with teaching pastor Kyle Idleman, talking with both about planned preaching.

• A wide variety of ministry majors can earn their final 30 credit hours in an intensive yearlong leadership residency with Christ’s Church of the Valley in Peoria, Arizona, under the leadership of Don Wilson and Dr. Mark Moore.

 

Maximized Stewardship

Why are we so intentional in this? The fact is, we are living in an historical moment when the future of Christian higher education is in flux. Some are asking if Bible colleges and Christian universities can survive and thrive. At OCC, we think strategic partnerships are part of the answer to that question. Teaming up with great churches and ministries helps us fulfill our mission both more effectively and more efficiently.

Simply put, it helps us do our job better. It maximizes our stewardship—we don’t have to duplicate on our campus the resources and personnel that our students can already tap into off campus. Such partnerships introduce our students to frontline ministry experts—they’re learning practical ministry skills from the best practitioners. Partnerships connect students to the larger work of our brotherhood—they feel more like a part of the relational network we call the “independent Christian churches.”

 

Kingdom Synergy

Ultimately, our partnerships model for our students the value of working together—they catch the vision of interdependent Christian churches. We want them to see that such joint ventures create great kingdom synergy—the impact is greater than the sum of the parts.

That’s why our fellowship has produced so many thriving ministries. I think of Christian Missionary Fellowship, Team Expansion, the International Conference on Missions, Good News Productions International, Stadia, Orchard Group, Nexus, Exponential, Christian service camps, Christ In Youth, Bible colleges, Christian universities, City on a Hill Productions, Rapha House, Church Development Fund, Solomon Foundation, Pioneer Bible Translators, International Disaster Emergency Service, Deaf Missions, Christian Churches Disability Ministry, the National Preaching Summit, the North American Christian Convention, Central India Christian Mission, and scores of others.

There are literally millions of people being reached with the gospel of Jesus Christ because of kingdom collaborations in our brotherhood. How did all this happen in a group of churches with no denominational structure, no formal organization?

It happened because someone saw a need and had the freedom in our independent group to act on it. It happened because someone took the initiative and gathered churches around that need. It happened because someone knew someone else who knew someone else who knew someone else, and they all picked up the phone and called each other. It happened because congregations with similar passions and commitments joined to support a common kingdom work.

It happened because we worked together.

So at OCC, we’ll keep pursuing gospel partnerships (Philippians 1:5). We want our students to be grateful for their Restoration Movement heritage. We also want them to learn one way our fellowship will maintain “movement” in advancing God’s kingdom.

It’s the Lego Principle.

Stay connected.

 

Matt Proctor serves as president of Ozark Christian College, Joplin, Missouri. 

The Best Sermon I’ve Ever Heard

$
0
0

By Arron Chambers

Christian leaders, some of them preachers themselves, tell us about a sermon they can’t forget—and maybe you won’t either.

(from left) Geoff Surratt, Ruth T. Reyes, and David Smith

(from left) Geoff Surratt, Ruth T. Reyes, and David Smith

Geoff Surratt

Geoff Surratt has served on the leadership teams at Seacoast Church and Saddleback Church, and as managing director of Exponential. He is an author of The Multi-Site Church Revolution, The Multi-Site Church Roadtrip, and Ten Stupid Things that Keep Churches from Growing. He now serves as pastor of church planting at Southeast Christian Church in Parker, Colorado, as well as coaching churches and leaders around the country. Geoff lives in Denver, Colorado, with his wife, Sherry. Geoff and Sherry have two awesome kids, a wonderful daughter-in-law, and the most beautiful granddaughters on earth.

Geoff’s Best Sermon: The best sermon on defining the basics of following Christ by Andy Stanley, senior pastor, North Point Community Church in Alpharetta, Georgia (http://northpoint.org/messages/brand-new/redefining-terms/).

Why Geoff likes this sermon: “It is amazing how much emphasis church leaders put on things Jesus would likely consider minor, and how little emphasis we place on the one thing both Paul and Jesus said is central to the Christian faith. Andy Stanley does a great job refocusing us on the main thing.”

Ruth T. Reyes

Ruth T. Reyes is professor of music and assistant dean of the School of Communication and Creative Arts at Johnson University Florida. Ruth is a volunteer musician and teacher at Real Life Christian Church, Clermont, Florida. Ruth’s passion is studying the Word of God and investing in young people’s lives.

Ruth’s Best Sermon: The best sermon on relationships by Justin Miller of Real Life Christian Church in Clermont, Florida (http://real.life/watch/subpage/?sid=18&mid=209#.VQrwz05j0q0.mailto).

Why Ruth likes this sermon: “Justin Miller has a way with words that connect and cut right to the core. He explains Scriptures with simple honesty and reconciles its truth with practical suggestions to life. His comments on ‘wives to submit and be the yielding partner so that the husband can reflect Christ and his leadership . . . and that to willingly step down is a high calling’ resonated and convicted this stubborn heart of mine.”

David Smith

David Smith is the preacher at Moreland (Kentucky) Christian Church. He grew up in Elizabethton, Tennessee, and graduated from Florida Christian College in 1989. Dave has been the preacher at MCC for 23 years. He is married to Jan (Mabry), and they have two children, Ethan and Savanna.

David’s Best Sermon: The best sermon on endurance, by Matt Proctor (www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbRhc1Mbk9w&feature=youtu.be).

Why David likes this sermon: “Matt Proctor preached a sermon . . . at the [2009] NACC (with the theme “Still Amazed”) dealing with endurance when the Christian is going through difficulties.

“I have been preaching for 23 years at a small church in Moreland, Kentucky. In 2009, I almost quit the ministry and everything else in my life. Depression took over and I was done. There were a number of factors that probably led to this state, but I couldn’t ever put my finger on what caused this illness. (I had never gone through anything like this before). Week after week I went through the motions—preaching, visiting, etc.—but I wasn’t really there. I look back and wonder how God kept me going and doing the minimum of what I could get by with, without everyone in our church giving up on me. God, in his grace, is patient and loving indeed.

“Then came the NACC, which I try to attend every year. Thursday night, Matt Proctor preached to me. I don’t think it was coincidental that he was called to preach that particular sermon on that night, in that year. This was the beginning of my healing.

“The rest of the year was not great, but I had bought Matt’s book Finish-Line Faith that had in it a lot of what he said that night. I preached through his book, chapter by chapter [in 2010], and slowly came out of my depression, and God has blessed our little church in a cow pasture and my health ever since.

“I thank you, Matt. We have never met. But someday I will thank you in person. As preachers and teachers, we sometimes never know who is in our audience, and whom we might be encouraging to press on with that finish-line faith.”

Arron Chambers serves as lead minister with Journey Christian Church, Greeley, Colorado.


Overcoming the Dark Side of Leadership

$
0
0

By Matt Proctor

Why do some leaders fail? The answers often lie below the “waterline.”

10_Proctor_BrookBridge_JNThe Brooklyn Bridge is a New York City icon, but during its construction, controversy arose. It seemed to the watching public that no progress had been made for months on the New York tower—the Manhattan side of the river. While the Brooklyn tower rose 100 feet above the water, the New York tower was still 78 feet below the surface, unseen.

Building Below the Waterline

So in June 1872, the chief engineer of the project wrote: “To such of the general public as might imagine that no work had been done on the New York tower, because they see no evidence of it above the water, I should simply remark that the amount of the masonry and concrete laid on that foundation during the past winter, under water, is equal in quantity to the entire masonry of the Brooklyn tower visible today above the waterline.”1

The Brooklyn Bridge still stands today, serving the people of New York City. Why? Because, as Gordon MacDonald wrote in the Introduction for his book Building Below the Waterline,

The chief engineer and his construction team did their most patient and daring work where no one could see it: on the foundations of the towers below the waterline.

It is one more illustration of an ageless principle in leadership: the work done below the waterline (in a leader’s soul) . . . determines whether he or she will stand the test of time and challenge. This work . . . is done in quiet, where no one but God sees.

Wise leaders examine their soul’s foundations, shoring up areas of weakness so their ministry will stand firm.

Inspecting a Leader’s Foundations

This “below-the-waterline” work is the focus of Gary McIntosh and Sam Rima’s book Overcoming the Dark Side of Leadership. The book tackles an important question: what causes leadership failure? What forces underneath the surface of a leader’s life lead to the outward failure of integrity?

From a study of biblical, historical, and contemporary leaders, McIntosh and Rima suggest an answer: “Every leader suffers from some degree of personal dysfunction (which) often serves as the driving force behind an individual’s desire to achieve success” (p. 14). These unhealthy qualities are often undiagnosed and, left unchecked, can become destructive—our own personal “dark side.”

The authors argue that these dysfunctions develop at the intersection of personality type and past experiences. Unmet childhood needs, traumatic experiences, emotional debts felt because of past failures—all these shape within us certain subconscious motivations, which are then colored by our particular personality.

When Sigmund Freud wet his pants at age 7, his father’s reprimand included a comment to his wife, “The boy will come to nothing!” Later Freud said his life’s achievements were, in many ways, saying to his father, “You see, I have come to something.”2

McIntosh and Rima contend that such early experiences form a leader in deep and unhealthy ways. Whether an alcoholic father, perfectionistic mother, childhood school struggles, physical deficit, or teenage peer rejection, these early influences create dysfunctional behavioral patterns. Presidential historian David Abshire observed, “How many of our presidents in recent times have had personal crises because they never put away childish things, never grew out of their hang-ups, never learned from mistakes!”3

Great danger threatens if we refuse to dive beneath the surface of our lives, to take the inward journey to inspect our foundations. But if we are willing to “ride the monster all the way down,” as Annie Dillard puts it, then we can allow God to do his “healing, restorative work in long-buried areas of personal pain and shame.”4

It took a while, but after his sin with Bathsheba, King David eventually “rode the monster all the way down.” He faced his own dark side, and the message of Overcoming Your Dark Side is that every wise leader should echo David’s prayer in Psalm 139:23, 24: “Search me, God, and know my heart; test me and know my anxious thoughts. See if there is any offensive way in me, and lead me in the way everlasting.”

A Brief Pause for Theological Context

A critique of McIntosh and Rima: at times, they draw more heavily on psychology than theology, and their language is more psychoanalytical than biblical. Theologically speaking, what they are really talking about is our sinful nature (Ephesians 2:1-3). We are not simply “dysfunctional.” We are sinful.

Certainly our life’s experiences, intertwined with our environment and personality, affect how we specifically express that sinful nature. But when we fall short of God’s glory, we cannot blame it on unmet childhood needs. We cannot say, as the delinquent youths in West Side Story, “I’m depraved on account I’m deprived!” The problem is not our less-than-perfect upbringing; it’s our less-than-perfect heart (Jeremiah 17:9).

To fill in McIntosh and Rima’s missing biblical language, then, they are talking about various “besetting sins” that can develop in our leadership style (Hebrews 12:1). The most helpful part of their book diagnoses five such sinful leadership patterns—what Michael Mangis would call “signature sins.”5 All of us sin, but not all sin in the same ways. My sin follows certain patterns. “Even if we both struggle with the sin of lashing out in anger, I am likely to have it triggered and express it in different ways than you do. In other words, we don’t sin at random. Our sin takes a consistent and predictable course.”6

James 3:2 says, “We all stumble in many ways,” and we are wise to learn where we are particularly prone to stumble. Like a soul fingerprint, my “sin pattern is so characteristic that it can be used to identify me. . . . In fact, other people often know my sin profile better than I do myself.”7 In their book, MacIntosh and Rima help us as discern our besetting, or “signature” sins as leaders, providing practical diagnostic tools to go “below the waterline” and evaluate ourselves.

What Does Your Dark Side Look Like?

So what might your dark side look like? In Overcoming the Dark Side of Leadership, McIntosh and Rima outline five types of dysfunctional leaders.

The Compulsive Leader feels the need to maintain absolute order, seeing “the organization’s performance as a direct reflection of his own person and performance” (p. 106). These leaders pursue perfection to an extreme and often “develop very rigid . . .
daily routines” whether exercise, devotions, schedule, or leadership activities (p. 106). They try to control their environment and lack trust in others. (Think of Jimmy Carter’s famous insistence on scheduling the use of the White House tennis courts himself.) The authors offer Moses as a biblical example of a compulsive leader.

The Narcissistic Leader is self-absorbed, with an overinflated sense of his own importance and a constant need for attention. Narcissistic leaders “present various combinations of intense ambitiousness, grandiose fantasies . . . and overdependence on external admiration” (p. 115), Ironically, this type of leader is often uncertain of himself and unable to enjoy his accomplishments because of a basic insecurity. The narcissist views coworkers as “things” that either support or disrupt his own sense of self-worth, rather than people he can build up. Author’s examples: John F. Kennedy and King Solomon.

The Paranoid Leader is “shackled by suspicion” (p. 120). They are constantly afraid others will undermine their leadership. Such leaders are hypersensitive to criticism and may blow up at the slightest embarrassment. They are jealous of other gifted people (i.e., the preacher who won’t share his pulpit for fear the congregation will like another’s sermon more). The paranoid leader engages in political scheming and spying to maintain a grip on his position. Examples: Richard Nixon and King Saul.

The Codependent Leader often grew up with a troubled family member—such as an alcoholic, oppressive, or simply socially embarrassing parent—for whom they needed to “cover.” They have learned to avoid open expression of feelings, as well as direct discussion of problems. The codependent leader desires approval, worrying obsessively about others’ feelings, and works to keep peace at all cost (even at the expense of truth), often covering up problems rather than facing them. Author’s examples: Bill Clinton and Samson.

The Passive-Aggressive Leader is, at core, afraid. He’s afraid of failure, of success, and especially of revealing his true feelings. Rather than actively resisting what he disagrees with, he passively resists—through “procrastination, dawdling, stubbornness, forgetfulness, and intentional inefficiency” (p. 141). Instead of openly expressing his thoughts, he communicates phony goodwill. For years, Thomas Jefferson feigned friendship with his political rival John Adams while trashing him behind his back. Biblical example: Jonah.

The High Stakes of “Soul Keeping”

Why is it so important to confront our dark side? John Ortberg writes, “I am responsible to take care of my soul not just for my own sake. The condition of my soul will affect the people around me, just as when my body is sick it can infect others who get too close.”8 The stakes of soul keeping are especially high for leaders, and MacIntosh and Rima will be helpful guides in getting below the waterline of your life.

As you do, two pieces of good news. First, God can use imperfect people. (Those are the only kind of people he’s ever had to work with.) Second, regardless of your “signature sin” as a leader, the gospel holds the promise of true transformation in Jesus Christ.

________

1 David McCullough, The Great Bridge (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1983), 269.

2 James MacGregor Burns, Leadership (New York City: Harper Perennial, 2010), 105.

3 As cited in Gordon MacDonald, The Resilient Life (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2006), 103.

4 Gary McIntosh and Samuel Rima, Overcoming the Dark Side of Leadership (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2007), 23.

5 Michael Mangis, Signature Sins: Taming the Wayward Heart (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2008).

6 John Ortberg, The Me I Want to Be (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2009), 147.

7 Ibid.

8 John Ortberg, Soul Keeping: Caring for the Most Important Part of You (Grand Rapids: Thomas Nelson, 2014), 96.

Matt Proctor serves as president of Ozark Christian College, Joplin, Missouri. He is one of CHRISTIAN STANDARD’s contributing editors.

My Theology and My Leadership

$
0
0

By Matt Proctor

A few years ago, I was asked to give a class lecture on “how my theology affects my leadership.” What a helpful exercise! I tried to dig beneath the surface of my leadership practices to find my underlying motivating beliefs. As I brought these to the surface, I could see whether they squared well with Scripture. I ended up listing 10 ways my theology shaped my leadership. A few examples:

02_Life7_Proctor_JNMe vs. Us

Despite my natural Lone Ranger tendencies, I have moved to a more team leadership approach. When I began as president, I was the only administrator who sat in for the entirety of our trustee board meetings. Today, my two executive vice presidents take part in these also, helping me represent the faculty and staff better to our trustees and represent the trustees better to our faculty and staff.

This shift, along with other team-oriented changes, is rooted in the doctrine of the Trinity. God himself is not a solitary figure, but a community of three persons who share ideas, wisdom, and responsibility. “Let us make mankind in our image” (Genesis 1:26, author emphasis). “Come, let us go down and confuse their language” (Genesis 11:7, author emphasis). “Whom shall I send, and who will go for us?” (Isaiah 6:8, author emphasis).

As humans made in his image, we too operate best as leaders when we do so in community—less me and more us. My theology led to greater team leadership.

Puppet Ministry vs. Pauline Epistles

Another example: We regularly receive suggestions on classes we should require in our curriculum. Most are in the areas of general education (Survey of British Literature) or professional education (How to Organize a Puppet Ministry). Interestingly, I rarely hear people outside the college suggest classes for our biblical education area: “You need a class on Lamentations!” Though many are good ideas, if we included every suggestion, our students would need eight years to graduate, instead of four!

How do we decide which classes make it on the required list? Our doctrine of Scripture. While our students take both general and professional classes, the most generous helping on their educational plate is still reserved for biblical classes. Our Bible college accrediting agency mandates 30 hours of required Bible classes. We, however, require 50 hours—mostly straight-up exegetical classes like Acts, Romans, and Titus.

We are out of the norm, even among Bible colleges, because we really do believe Scripture is the best way for “the servant of God” to be “thoroughly equipped for every good work” (2 Timothy 3:16, 17). A mind full of God’s Word, a heart formed by God’s Word—these are the most important preparation for ministry. I want our students to get a practical education, but I will resist the pressure to cut Bible classes to do so. My theology influences curriculum decisions.

Poker vs. Uno

One last example: Poker players play their cards “close to the vest.” But when my daughter Caroline was 5, her small hands prompted her to simply lay all her UNO cards out on the table, face up for all to see. (I used to beat her all the time!) Some books encourage leaders to communicate like a poker player, keeping most organizational information private.

My leadership habit, however, has been to communicate like Caroline playing UNO, laying all my informational cards on the table for all to see. I would rather run the risk of overcommunicating than undercommunicating. While some matters certainly require confidentiality, I have tried to share our finances, strategic planning, and organizational decision-making processes as openly and regularly as possible.

Why? In seminary, I read Carl F. H. Henry’s six-volume God, Revelation and Authority, his massive study built around 15 theses. His first thesis asserts that revelation was God’s gracious choice to give up his privacy and instead practice deliberate disclosure. God could have remained private, aloof, distant, inscrutable.

Instead, more than 300 times in the Old Testament alone, we read phrases like “Thus saith the Lord,” “the Lord said,” or “the Word of the Lord came.” While God doesn’t tell us everything we’d like to know, he communicates more like an UNO player (specifically, my daughter Caroline) than a poker player. My theology of God as Revelator has shaped my leadership communication.

Matt Proctor serves as president with Ozark Christian College, Joplin, Missouri.

From Vile to Victory

$
0
0

By Matt Proctor

“I remember being in the bars at 3 years old with my mother singing in the bands,” says Juliet Rose. Juliet was born into addiction. Her mother drank heavily, and her dad was a drug addict.

Her mother married another man when Juliet was 4, and “that’s when monsters became real.” Her new stepdad molested her for the next five years.

ArrestShe always felt alone. “I had no friends, so I quit school in the ninth grade. I had no education, no life skills.” At 16, she fled to Las Vegas, where she survived as a prostitute. That chapter of her life ended with her beaten-up, used-up, robbed at gunpoint, and left for dead on the street.

Then things got bad.

By age 32, she had been married three times and had two children. She became “a functioning addict,” using and manufacturing methamphetamine. When the Jasper County Drug Task Force kicked down her door and arrested her—for the ninth time—on 11 felony charges, prison seemed a sure bet.

Worst of all, her boys—ages 4 and 8—were taken from her. For Juliet, that was rock bottom.

“I was broken. They took the only two people in the world who had ever loved me unconditionally,” she says through tears. “I fell on my face before God, and I said, ‘I’m sorry, God. I want my babies back. Whatever it takes, I’m gonna serve you!’”

Over the next eight months, Juliet surrendered her life to Christ, turned her back on drugs and alcohol, and welcomed her boys back home. Though prison seemed likely, miraculously all charges were dropped. That’s when she heard God say, Now I can use you, Juliet. I’m going to use every vile thing that has happened to you to serve other women.

She enrolled at Ozark Christian College, and I’ve never had a student more joyful in the Lord than Juliet. She graduated with a psychology and counseling degree, and today, Juliet leads Guiding Light Ministries, a faith-based residential treatment program for women with addictions.

I asked Juliet to share her testimony as a trophy of grace in our college chapel. When she closed—“I’ve been clean and sober for six years and three days today!”—the college family stood to their feet in a thunderous ovation.

Tears streamed down her cheeks and the cheeks of six of “her girls” from Guiding Light on the front row. Jesus had taken what was “vile” and turned it into victory.

A better story indeed.

Matt Proctor is president of Ozark Christian College, Joplin, Missouri.

An Interview with Matt Proctor

$
0
0
Matt Proctor

Matt Proctor

Matt Proctor challenges parents to seize their opportunity to create a lasting legacy through their children. Get his tips for parenting in this exclusive interview with Editor Mark Taylor at the 2016 North American Christian Convention.

10 Ways Your Church Can Move More Young People Toward Vocational Ministry

$
0
0

By Matt Proctor

1. Preach on the need for full-time kingdom workers.

All Christians are ministers, no matter their vocation. There is no clergy/laity distinction in God’s church, and all believers are called to witness, lead, and serve. “You got into the ministry when you got out of the baptistery.” May we never water down the biblical teaching on the priesthood of all believers (1 Peter 2:9).

But this too: may we never water down the need for vocational Christian leaders. Preach on the need for those who will give their working lives to leading the church, reaching the lost, preaching the Word (1 Corinthians 9:14).

I have a “road sermon” I’ve preached in many churches on Matthew 9:37, 38. “The harvest is plentiful, but the workers are few. Ask the Lord of the harvest, therefore, to send out workers into his harvest field.” Too many times, after challenging the church to raise up vocational Christian workers, people say to me, “I’ve never heard a sermon on that before.”

Remind your church that without full-time kingdom leaders, most Bible translations would never exist and most pioneering mission work would never happen. Without vocational leaders, too many churches are never planted, too many congregations never grow, too many children are never taught, marriages never mended, addictions never broken, hungry never fed, nations never reached, and souls never saved.

The harvest is still plentiful; the workers are still few. Preach the need.

2. Make this a dial on your church’s dashboard.

Every church has a set of stats they monitor—worship attendance, offerings, baptisms, small group participation, volunteer numbers—to check their congregation’s health. Add a dial to your dashboard: number of young people sent into vocational ministry.

We measure what matters, so count how many students you’ve sent to Bible college in the last three years. Then decide to raise that number. Put “kingdom recruiter” on everybody’s job description, and set a goal. As Andy Stanley says, “Clarify the win.”

For 35 years, Henrietta Mears taught the college Sunday school class at First Presbyterian Church in Hollywood, California. Five foot four inches tall, thickset, with “Coke-bottle” glasses and a deep love for Christ, this passionate woman made “vocational ministers raised” a measure of her ministry. She sent out more than 400 young men and women into Christian service. Among them: Young Life founder Jim Rayburn and Campus Crusade for Christ founder Bill Bright. Those two leaders alone represent hundreds of thousands of lives reached for Christ!

That’s a win.

3. Plant seed thoughts in the minds of potential kingdom leaders.

They might be the brightest students in the youth group, because God’s mission in the world needs the best leaders. Or they might be the C students, because God has a habit of choosing unlikely folks to make a big difference (1 Corinthians 1:27). Wherever you find them, plant the idea that God might be calling them to ministry. Say something.

Eighty-year-old D. P. Shaffer was still preaching in Conneautville, Pennsylvania, when he heard a first-grader quote a large portion of John 14 in front of the congregation. After the service, D. P. patted the boy’s head and said, “You are going to make a good preacher someday.”

That little boy’s name was Bob Russell, who never forgot those words and went on to lead Southeast Christian Church in Louisville, Kentucky, to great kingdom impact.

Never underestimate the power of your words.

4. Speak of the joys of ministry.

Yes, ministry is hard, people can be frustrating, and the paycheck can be small. But don’t let difficulties be the only things young people overhear about ministry.

Let them also hear of the blessings. In 25 years of ministry, I’ve helped a child find John 3:16 for the first time. I have held the hand of a precious saint as she passed out of this world and into the arms of Jesus. I have lowered an obedient body into a liquid tomb and brought him back up to new life.

I have stood to preach on an ordinary Sunday—with 10,000 angels leaning over the balconies of Heaven, holding their breath, 10,000 demons glaring up through the gates of Hell, human eternities hanging in the balance—and I have seen proud spirits broken, wounded hearts healed, spiritual adrenaline surge through weary souls, and final destinies forever changed. Glory to God! In the great drama of the ages, we get to play a part!

Let young people hear: there are greater paychecks than those you cash at the bank. Speak of the joys of serving Jesus.

5. Involve young people in ministry now.

Take prospective kingdom workers on mission trips. Let them lead worship. Take them with you on a hospital visit. Help them prepare a lesson or sermon. A taste of ministry may whet their appetite for full-time service.

At a megachurch minister’s conference, Bob Russell was assigned the topic, “If I Had My Ministry to Do Over Again.” He mentioned seven things he’d do differently. One of them: Bob would start a junior high preacher’s club to recruit future ministers. Not a bad idea.

When Christian school principal Larry Leathermon saw preaching potential in a skinny, smart-alecky seventh-grader, he assigned him a topic to preach in the school chapel. That junior higher may be the only person in church history to preach his first sermon on the subject of “Jesus: A High Priest in the Order of Melchizedek”! But that eight-minute, very forgettable sermon lit in his heart a passion to preach which still burns today.

That young man was me.

6. Connect them to kingdom heroes.

Our culture holds up athletes, models, business tycoons, and entertainers as heroes. Who will the young people in your church aspire to be?

Bring in missionaries to share their stories. Invite Bible college professors to preach in worship or youth group. Introduce young people to kingdom servants—at Christ In Youth gatherings and camp and conventions—and tell your students the backstory on each one. I know a church whose main hallway is lined with 8-by-10-inch photographs of each Timothy the congregation has sent out over the last 35 years.

I’ve had my own children read biographies of great saints of the past, taken them to a local nursing home to meet one of my spiritual mentors, and included them on trips to meet ministry leaders I admire.

An ancient Greek proverb says, “A people are known by the heroes they crown.” Connect your young people to men and women who have given their working lives to kingdom work.

Teenagers worship at an Ozark Christian College weekend event planned especially for them. Ozark hosts three such events each year—two for older teens and one for younger teens. The events not only help the teens dig deeper into the Word and faith, but also introduce them to a Christian college campus.

Teenagers worship at an Ozark Christian College weekend event planned especially for them. Ozark hosts three such events each year—two for older teens and one for younger teens. The events not only help the teens dig deeper into the Word and faith, but also introduce them to a Christian college campus.

7. Take young people to visit a Bible college.

Let them sit in classes, worship in chapel, and sleep in the dorm. Introduce them to college students who will share their stories of God’s call. Sit in a professor’s office or two, and let them paint a picture of how God uses Bible colleges to shape people for life and ministry.

Young people who had never considered ministry suddenly find themselves immersed in a culture focused on full-time kingdom leadership. A vision is caught, and these teenagers begin to ask, “Would God want to use me in this way?”

Oswald Chambers, author of My Utmost for His Highest, was also a Bible college professor. The purpose of a Bible college, he wrote, is “for God to help Himself to lives.”

That can even happen on a campus visit.

8. Challenge parents to give their children to the Lord.

It’s often harder to convince parents to consider ministry than to convince students. Many are unsettled when their child shows interest in leadership ministry.

“Ministry is so stressful.” “The pay is so small.” “You need a degree that will help you in the real world.” “What if you (and my future grandchildren) are called to Africa?” It’s one thing to send a check to the mission field; it’s another thing to send a child.

Part of discipling the parents in your church will be challenging them to give their children fully to the Lord. Listen to their concerns. Then remind them of God’s care for their children. Give them a good ministry biography to read. Connect them to kingdom heroes, and share the joys of ministry. Connect them to other parents who have a child in ministry. Challenge them to pray, and pray with them.

Help parents set their children free to respond to God’s call in their lives.

9. Support ministry studies financially.

West Point trains leaders for our nation’s battles, and we as taxpayers underwrite a cadet’s education because a prepared military leadership matters. The church has Bible colleges and seminaries to train leaders for the spiritual battle, and it is fitting that the church underwrite that education because a prepared spiritual leadership really matters.

Financially support the schools themselves, but also consider paying for a particular student’s education.

Lexington preacher Wayne Smith once led a young man in the U.S. Army to the Lord and wrote faithfully to him during his enlistment, asking him to consider ministry when he was finished. When the soldier was discharged, he discovered Wayne had already enrolled him at Cincinnati Bible Seminary and paid for his first year’s tuition! That young man’s name was Joe Wright, who saw thousands come to Christ during his ministry at Central Christian Church in Wichita, Kansas.

Kingdom leaders are a good return on investment.

10. Pray.

Jesus commanded, “Ask the Lord of the harvest, therefore, to send out workers into the harvest field.” Do you pray this prayer?

My testimony: I grew up knowing I was called to be a preacher. But when I was named a National Merit finalist in high school, I pulled a Jonah and ran from God’s call. I enrolled at the University of Iowa as a journalism major. (Tom Brokaw went to the University of Iowa.) I was going to make my name in the world, and that year at the university, I was a prodigal son in a far country.

The following summer, I worked at a Christian camp—dishwasher, trash collector, woodchopper—and during the evening chapel services, I would stand in the back during worship. I liked the music and thought the band was cool, but when the preacher stood to preach, I would leave. I didn’t want to hear it.

During the ninth-grade camp, the week’s preacher was an unassuming little guy named Bob Martin. Bob was not what you’d call a dynamic youth speaker, but when he began to preach, I couldn’t leave. His words reached out and grabbed me, and the Holy Spirit began a weeklong blitz on my heart.

At Thursday night’s invitation, after Bob’s message, a crowd of crying ninth-grade girls walked down the aisle to rededicate their lives to Jesus (for the 17th time), and so did one college freshman guy. In front of that camp, I repented. It was time to get right with God and follow his call. I was heading to Bible college to be a preacher.

What I did not know at the time: Bob Martin knew my story. (My hometown preacher was his brother-in-law.) He knew I was a Jonah.

What else I did not know at the time: Bob had fasted that entire week and prayed for me every single day by name.

The only reason I’m writing this article is because Bob Martin prayed me back into the kingdom . . . and right into ministry.

Who is waiting for you to pray them into ministry?

Matt Proctor serves as president with Ozark Christian College, Joplin, Missouri.

‘Tomorrow’ Workshop

$
0
0
(Clockwise from top left) Mark Taylor, Matt Proctor, Jennifer Johnson, and Ben Cachiaras

(Clockwise from top left) Mark Taylor, Matt Proctor, Jennifer Johnson, and Ben Cachiaras

CHRISTIAN STANDARD hosted a workshop about the future of the movement it has served for 150 years. Hear the discussion, conducted during the North American Christian Convention in Anaheim in 2016, with Matt Proctor, Jennifer Johnson, and Ben Cachiaras, hosted by editor Mark A. Taylor. Complete workshop here.

What About Tomorrow?

$
0
0

By Mark A. Taylor

In recognition of CHRISTIAN STANDARD’s 150th birthday earlier this year, the North American Christian Convention featured a workshop led by three of the magazine’s contributing editors. We asked each of them to think about hopes and challenges they see for the future of the churches served by this magazine for a century and a half. 

The comments below are edited from the hour-long workshop. See the whole session here.

Ben Cachiaras, Jennifer Johnson, and Matt Proctor discuss the hopes and challenges they see for the future of the church served by CHRISTIAN STANDARD, which celebrates its 150th anniversary this year. (Photo ©Tom Patrick)

Ben Cachiaras, Jennifer Johnson, and Matt Proctor discuss the hopes and challenges they see for the future of the church served by CHRISTIAN STANDARD, which celebrates its 150th anniversary this year. (Photo ©Tom Patrick)

Matt Proctor

What will be the future of the independent Christian churches? As I considered the churches I’ve seen, I thought of three answers to that question:

Diversify or die—As a guy from the Midwest, I rejoice when I visit the West Coast and see the amazing racial and ethnic diversity the Lord has brought together in some of the churches out here. For example, when I get to visit Shepherd Church where Dudley Rutherford, one of our graduates, preaches, I rejoice to see the little glimpse of Heaven reflected there.

When I go back home to a lot of the churches in the Midwest, I don’t see that, and it breaks my heart. You know that about four years ago, the tables turned, the scale tipped. There are now, every year, more non-Caucasian babies born in the United States than there are Caucasian babies. That’s a wonderful and beautiful thing.

If we want to be a movement on into the 21st century, we have to diversify or die. That’s true for us biblically and missionally but practically as well.

Develop or die—By that I mean, develop the next generation of leaders. I see a vocational leadership vacuum today. As you know, the baby boomer generation is stepping into retirement right now. We’re not even keeping up at replacement levels. More churches call me for names of prospective ministers than I have names to give. And just replacing workers is not enough. We’re supposed to be working for growth; we’re supposed to be increasing the numbers of vocational Christian workers.

Ask the Lord of the harvest to send out laborers into the harvest field. There’s a generational shift coming even among our megachurch ministers; several of them will be stepping into retirement soon. Who will follow them? The answer to that question will greatly influence whether that congregation will continue to identify with our tribe.

Discuss or die—Let’s be willing to discuss our differences.

I’m a small church guy. I ministered in a small church. I attend a small church in Joplin, 150 folks, some of God’s best saints there. At the same time, I am so proud and so grateful for the men that God has raised up to lead the megachurches in our movement. I count it a joy and a blessing to get to know these guys and see how God is using them.

But I also get to interact with a lot of smaller church guys, and there are some differences—differences in methodology and sometimes even differences in philosophy, how we approach doctrinal issues. Not that any of them are compromising doctrinally, but they may differ in how they approach doctrine.

At times I sense a bit of divide, a bit of a shift between some of the folks in some of the smaller churches and some of the guys in the megachurch. I don’t want to see that potential rift widen any more.

The only way I know to bridge such a divide is through relational context. We need more discussions where we can talk honestly and not label each other and not throw inflammatory words at each other. If we want to remain a tribe, a movement, a connected body of churches, we must keep talking. We can’t let some family member stop coming to the reunion.

Jennifer Johnson

As I thought about this topic I thought about my house. I live outside of Philadelphia in a house that was built in 1902. When you restore an old house, as we have done with part of ours, it’s not just about bringing it back to the original condition.

You might strip off the wallpaper that was put up in 1973. You might rip up the ugly shag carpeting to get back to the original nice floors, but you don’t just leave it there, right? You repaint, you polish those floors, you sand them down. It’s about taking the skeleton of the original and making it workable for a new generation.

Sometimes it also means getting rid of some things—that addition that was added that you no longer need, or the basketball hoop installed two families ago.

Process—At a certain point the analogy breaks down, but the idea is that restoration is an ongoing process for every generation. The same thing is true, I think, when it comes to restoring the church. We’re not trying to get back to every facet of the New Testament church, because culturally and sociologically we’re not the same people they were.

Of course, some of the ongoing dialogue about what it means to be the Restoration Movement is which of the things are eternal, which of the things are cultural, which of the things are temporal. Each new generation of leaders must grapple with that. As we do that, we must understand our heritage, which has always wrestled with unity on the one hand and truth on the other.

In case you haven’t noticed, those things are not easy to combine, right? It’s really difficult to hold a balance between unity and biblical truth. It was always hard. It was hard for Stone and Campbell. Stone said, “Let Christian unity be our polar star,” right? This is the same guy who rejected substitutionary atonement. He didn’t really get onboard with the idea of the Trinity. He thought Campbell was kind of a stick-in-the-mud.

And Campbell thought Stone was just out there, right? I mean these guys had significant differences even at the very beginning of what we think of, maybe sometimes idealistically, as the glory days of the Restoration Movement. It was always messy— from the very beginning.

We have to wrestle with that same messiness and we have to do it in our context and we have to be able to dialogue about what that looks like.

Some things make that especially difficult for us. One is that we live in a culture and in a time in which it is possible to avoid conversation with anyone who disagrees with us. We don’t have to have unity because we can seek unanimity and just talk to people who think exactly like we do. It’s possible in every area of life whether we’re talking about politics, religion, or parenting.

We must be intentional about reaching across some of those divides and having some of those conversations and letting them be messy. I’m not the scholar that my brothers here are, but my understanding is that there are differences that Stone and Campbell went to the grave with, that they just never resolved.

Sometimes we’re frustrated because we believe unity means that everybody else in the independent Christian churches has to agree with us on every facet. Our essentials need to be the same as their essentials, or otherwise we can’t have unity. I think we need a bigger definition of unity; it doesn’t always have to mean agreement on everything.

Motive—Finally, I believe we need a motive for unity and restoration. The goal is not just getting along or feeling good about ourselves as the independent Christian churches. We need a reason to deal with this messiness between unity and truth because it is a very hard balance to find. Our motive for that is not doctrinal purity, because that was never achieved by anybody. Their goal was evangelism.

We have to wrestle with whether or not we can find that as our goal for unity and for restoration in this century. If that’s not our goal then we need to figure out why we’re so concerned about unity. Because it’s really about reaching the rest of the world for Christ.

We need to be able to reach more people for Jesus because of what we’re doing. Our goal for unity has to be about mission.

Ben Cachiaras

Good things—I used to believe everybody knows about all the really good things happening in our tribe. Now I’ve come to see that not everybody does. I go places where there’s a very deep pessimism. Sometimes this comes from some negative encounter a person has had with someone legalistic in our tribe. And they’ve allowed that experience to tell them, “That’s how those Christian churches are.”

But there are many good things happening among us.

I believe it’s still true that our group has more megachurches per capita than any other denomination. And these congregations are reaching a whole lot of people for Christ.

We continue to excel in church planting, and the church planting conference Exponential, which was birthed in our movement, attracts thousands of attendees every year. The growth of global missions is soaring in certain ways as it never has. Our colleges, while they have their struggles, are still putting out tremendous students. CIY is booming off the charts and involving hundreds and hundreds of students every week all summer.

I have conversations all the time with leaders in the denominational and the nondenominational free-floating worlds. These are pastors looking at us and asking, “How can I get in?”

Much of this is because of our open spirit that rewards creative spiritual entrepreneurship. You can try stuff even if it’s dumb. No one can tell you no.

At the same time there’s enough of a network to help you succeed. I have some nondenominational friends who are solo Christians out there with churches that are not connected to any tribe. And they’re desperate for a way to make a bigger imprint. They can’t plant churches or do effective missions work by themselves; they’re free-floating and stuck.

But we have this network where everybody knows many others; we have connections, and those relationships are how churches get planted, colleges funded, and mission still happens.

Concerns—I have several concerns, but they start with the fact that even defining our tribe is difficult. We are not uniform or homogeneous. And many of us are sensing that the cohesive elements that have defined us and allowed us to cohere together are weakening. Some of those were culturally bound or time bound in certain ways.

We don’t have some of the common enemies we used to have. We don’t have some of the institutions that have bound us historically. Our colleges aren’t the unifying factors they once were. This convention isn’t a convention that many people feel is that important. And the magazine whose 150-year anniversary we’re celebrating has seen a decline in readership.

Every movement goes through a life cycle that begins with a need to fill and a problem to answer; then it moves through a bureaucratization stage. The movement will decline after that unless it is renewed.

But the renewal efforts within our tribe aren’t bought into by everyone. There’s no clear sense of who’s going to help lead us collectively forward. This is a tenuousness that has always been part of us but is intensified by our times.

Challenges—Several factors present a crisis that also contains an opportunity.

First, I see us evolving hermeneutically. Everyone loves the Bible, but figuring out what the text actually means and how to apply it today is not something that everyone agrees on. We’re starting to admit that a little more than maybe we did in our earlier days. God-fearing, smart, honest, Bible-trusting, Jesus-fearing people are reading the same text and coming up with different understandings about how to obey it in a way that will be faithful to Jesus today.

We see this conflict in many discussions: women in ministry, creation care and the environment, race, LGBT. My plea is for us not to take our ball and go home every time someone disagrees with us on something we think is important.

And we’re broadening politically. It wasn’t that long ago that someone came up to me at an NACC and said, “I feel like I just attended the Republican National Convention.” And most people liked it that way. Nowadays that’s not true. And when you have a different political frame of reference, it changes how you read the Bible about such issues as poverty or race.

Follow-up

Johnson—Since we don’t have the common enemy that united us decades ago, maybe we’re finding each other to be enemies. We’re creating submovements within our movement—probably not intentionally, but I see it happening. We’re creating dividing lines within our movement on such issues as what women can and can’t do, or the homosexual issue, or even racial concerns.

Some of the people on different sides of these issues consider them very much to be doctrinal essentials. It is black and white. And when people’s perspectives are that different, it can be hard to find common ground.

Proctor—I think Bob Russell used to put it something like this. It’s the soldiers in the barracks that get into fights with each other, not the soldiers on the battle line. They’re all focused that way, together, shoulder to shoulder.

Mark Taylor is publisher and editor of Christian Standard. Matt Proctor is president of Ozark Christian College, Joplin, Missouri. Jennifer Johnson is a freelance writer, editor, and speaker whose home is outside Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Ben Cachiaras is senior pastor with Mountain Christian Church, Joplin, Missouri.


Can I Be a Christian and a Patriot?

$
0
0

Four biblical principles about our earthly citizenship

By Matt Proctor

Full confession: I love America.

I was born on an overseas U.S. Army base where my father served, and I respect the office of president, sing the national anthem, salute the flag, and own the movie Captain America.

But my study of God’s Word has led me to decide how I should view my love of country in terms of my higher calling.

Two summers ago, I took my 10- and 12-year-old sons on a weeklong U.S. history tour. We imagined being an immigrant at Ellis Island, marveled at the Statue of Liberty, stood silent at the 9/11 Memorial at Ground Zero, and learned about Jackie Robinson at the Baseball Hall of Fame.

We read the inscriptions on the Lincoln and Jefferson Memorials, visited the U.S. Capitol, the White House, Arlington National Cemetery, Mount Vernon, the Smithsonian, the Liberty Bell, Benjamin Franklin’s grave, Philadelphia’s Independence Hall, and we recited the Gettysburg Address on the Pennsylvania battlefield itself.

Patriotism is not a bad word in my book.

But What About . . . ?

But the idea of patriotism leaves many Christians uneasy. When our nation celebrates the Fourth of July, many preachers wonder if it’s right to plan a “patriotic service,” for several reasons:

• It could unintentionally exclude those from other countries. No Christian wants to make a fellow believer feel left out, but an American missionary back on furlough tells of attending a Sunday worship service:

“We were singing patriotic songs. At one point, the congregation pledged allegiance to the American flag. My wife, a Romanian citizen at that time, did not participate in the singing or pledging, of course. Neither did a recently converted girl from overseas who was visiting that weekend. In that moment, the oddness of the scene struck me. We were in a worship service with fellow believers, including one just-baptized, who could not participate.”

10-Proctor_JN• It could unintentionally communicate that God has a special affection for America. I saw a bumper sticker: “Jesus loves you . . . but I’m his favorite.” Could a patriotic worship service accidentally communicate the idea that God loves America more than other nations?

Herman Melville wrote, “We Americans are the peculiar chosen people, the Israel of our time,”1 and while some use American exceptionalism to point to our history as a unique experiment in democracy, others use it to mean we are anointed uniquely by God—a position hard to defend from Scripture.

Many pastors want to avoid anything that could unintentionally feed an American “superiority complex.”

• It could unintentionally deify our country. Christians would say their first allegiance is to God. But could singing praises about America in worship accidentally confuse folks about their primary loyalty?

Paul Minear quotes an Ohio minister: “In our early service, it’s customary for the congregation to remain seated during the second hymn, but after our July 3rd service, I just about had a rebellion on my hands because I did not ask the people to stand up this time. The hymn was ‘America the Beautiful.’

“It’s perfectly all right, apparently, to sit down for ‘Our God, Our Help in Ages Past,’ but irreverent to do so when we sing about our nation.”2

Some preachers want to avoid the appearance of singing the glories of America louder than the glories of Christ.

Romans 13 vs. Revelation 13?

To be clear, many believers wrestle with questions deeper than “Should we have a patriotic service?” For them, the real issue is, “Should a Christian be a patriot at all?” After all, Scripture itself seems uneasy about a Christian’s relationship to his nation. On the one hand, we are commanded to submit to the governing authority who is “God’s servant for your good” (Romans 13:4). On the other hand, we are warned about the idolatry that happens when earthly governments demand our primary allegiance (Revelation 13).

What does the Bible really teach? Are God and country allies? Famous evangelist Billy Sunday said, “Christianity and patriotism are synonymous terms, and hell and traitors are synonymous.”3 Is he right—is being unpatriotic actually opposing God?

Or are God and country enemies? Trevin Wax, a millenial-generation Southern Baptist leader, says, “Older Southern Baptists are more likely to see the U.S. as Israel. Younger Southern Baptists are more likely to see the U.S. as Babylon. As we witness the quickly shifting tides of morality, [they] are less likely to see the U.S. as the de facto ‘good guy.’”4 Is patriotism actually an act of compromise with a corrupt culture?

These questions are important and deeply emotional, and with a presidential election just weeks away, they take on fresh significance. As you seek to answer them, let me suggest four biblical principles to consider.

1. God calls us to see ourselves as part of a multinational people.

In the Old Testament, Israel is certainly God’s chosen nation, but Israel’s purpose is ultimately to be a blessing and a light to all nations (Genesis 12:3; Isaiah 49:6). In the New Testament, the church is the New Israel, the new “chosen people” (Galatians 3:7-9; 6:16; 1 Peter 2:9), and because the church is multicultural from its very first day (Acts 2:8-11), God’s people are not confined to any one country. God desires a church made up of all nations (Matthew 28:19; Acts 1:8; Revelation 7:9).

What does this mean? Since we belong, by God’s express design, to a faith family that crosses national lines, we must be careful of associating being Christian with being an American or a Westerner. Kevin DeYoung says, “While American churches are in America, they must never be only American churches.”5 We have brothers and sisters all over the world, and we must never cease reminding our fellow believers of the international scope of God’s people.

What binds us together as believers is not the blood of our ancestors, but the blood of Christ—so following Jesus is a red thing, not a red, white, and blue thing. In fact, when we think about this biblically, we realize that “American believers have more in common with Arab believers in Iraq and Syria than they do with their unbelieving next-door neighbors.”6 We must see ourselves first and foremost as part of the multinational people of God.

2. God gives us our ethnic and national identity.

Yes, we’re part of a global people. But since the Tower of Babel, God in his wisdom has divided humanity into differing ethnic and national groups (Genesis 11), and he has placed each of us in our specific culture (Acts 17:26).

Paul says that in the church “there is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:28). But becoming a Christian does not erase a Jew’s ethnic identity (or a Greek’s) any more than it erases a man’s identity as a male. When John sees the great multitude worshipping at Heaven’s throne in Revelation 7, he does not see an ethnically homogenous group, a bland blend of people “in matching khakis and white polos.”7

Instead John sees distinct and recognizable people groups—Maasai and Chinese, Maori and Iranians, Mexicans and Germans. God is not color-blind. He delights in the full spectrum of colors, languages, and nationalities, and our cultural identity is part of his gift to us. So as one author puts it, “If you don’t have to renounce being an American in heaven, you shouldn’t have to pretend you aren’t one now.”8

What does this mean? First, we should certainly be grateful to God for whatever good gifts we enjoy because we live in our particular country (James 1:17). Second, we should think about God’s purpose in our given national identity—what does he want to teach us through the group in which he placed us? Perhaps God uses aspects of each worldwide culture to reveal some aspect of himself, and we should seek to discern those.

More broadly, though, C. S. Lewis argued that God might use patriotism toward any country to teach us something. “As the family offers us the first step beyond self-love, so [patriotism] offers us the first step beyond family selfishness. . . . It involves love of our neighbors. . . . All natural affections, including this, can become rivals to spiritual love; but they can also be preparatory imitations of it, training (so to speak) of the spiritual muscles which Grace may later put to a higher service.”9

When we are not part of a particular community—whether family or clan or city or nation—our sinful selfishness tends to flourish. We look out only for ourselves. But God made the human heart for community, and being part of a group puts a check on our ego.

History is full of stories of those who learned self-sacrifice for the sake of their “tribe.” Perhaps God uses our national identity to pull us out of self, teach us to love something bigger than ourselves, and prepare us to love him and his church sacrificially.

3. God commands us to be good citizens of our earthly home.

When the Israelites were taken into Babylonian exile, they were not to conform to the pagan practices of their new neighbors, but they were to be productive citizens—building houses, planting gardens, growing families (Jeremiah 29:4-6). God commanded them, “Seek the peace and prosperity of the city to which I have carried you into exile. Pray to the Lord for it, because if it prospers, you too will prosper” (Jeremiah 29:7).

In the New Testament, Peter tells his readers that they too are exiles—citizens of Heaven who are also temporary citizens of an earthly nation—and that they too should be good citizens, even in an empire as wicked as Rome (1 Peter 2:11-17). Such citizenship includes:

• praying for government leaders (1 Timothy 2:1, 2)

• showing respect to government leaders (1 Peter 2:17)

• obeying the laws of the land (Romans 13:1)

• paying taxes (Romans 13:6, 7)

• doing good works in the community (Titus 3:1)

• living courteously with neighbors (Titus 3:2)

• taking advantage of the rights afforded us (Acts 16:37, 38; 25:11).

What does this mean? Simply put, saints should make the best citizens. It is, in fact, an act of Christian witness (1 Peter 2:15). Certainly we may need to civilly disobey the state if it directly contradicts the command of God (Acts 4:18-20). But when Jesus said, “Give back to Caesar what is Caesar’s and to God what is God’s” (Mark 12:17), he showed that allegiance to God is not inherently incompatible with allegiance to country.

God and country are not always allies, but they need not be enemies either. It is possible to be a good Christian and a good American (or Brazilian or Kenyan). While you are a citizen of Heaven first (Philippians 3:20), you can “seek the peace and prosperity” of your earthly home. You can vote, sing your national anthem, pay taxes, salute your flag, and tell stories of your national heroes and still honor God above all.

4. God warns us about the danger of national idolatry.

In Revelation, Satan enlists three allies in his war against believers: two beasts and a prostitute. Evangelical scholars like John Stott say that—while the prostitute represents Rome’s hedonistic culture and the second beast represents Rome’s false religion—the first beast represents Rome’s godless government.10 Christians were being pressured to swear primary allegiance to Rome and her emperor, to call him “Lord” instead of Jesus.

Understand: Roman citizens—even Christian ones—were proud of their country. The Roman Empire was the premier power in the world, with an unmatched military, unprecedented freedoms, and unparalleled economic opportunities. To her citizens, Roman patriotism didn’t feel wrong, and pledging loyalty to the emperor seemed like a right and proper thing. But John warned that placing country above Christ was idolatry (Revelation 13:4).

What does this mean? While careful patriotism may be Christian, careless nationalism is not. Uncritical nationalism—a blind commitment to country above all else—is not unique to America.

C.S. Lewis once spoke to an old English clergyman who believed his nation to be markedly superior to all others. “But sir,” asked Lewis, “aren’t we told that every people thinks its own men the bravest and its own women the fairest in the world?” Lewis said, “He replied with total gravity—he could not have been graver if he had been saying the Creed at the altar—‘Yes, but in England it’s true.’”11

Like every other earthly love, the virtue of patriotism can become a vice when it takes too high a place in our heart. Throughout history, people have done terrible things in the name of country—treating foreigners with prejudice, oppressing other nations, killing innocent people—and at times, even Christians have let their love of country compromise their obedience to Christ. As Lewis said, patriotism “becomes a demon when it becomes a god.”12

So be on guard. Fly the American flag, but never higher than the cross. Take pride in the beauties of your homeland, but keep your eyes fixed firmly on Heaven, our true home. Be grateful for the sacrifice of our servicemen, but may it never move you more than the sacrifice of our Savior.

As this election cycle approaches, let’s remember that, as believers, we do not follow a donkey or an elephant. Nor do we follow an American eagle, a British bulldog, or a Russian bear.

No. Until the day we are gathered in that great heavenly multitude “from every nation, tribe, people and language,” we follow a Lamb.

________

1Herman Melville, White Jacket (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970), 161.

2Paul Minear, I Pledge Allegiance: Patriotism and the Bible (Philadelphia: Geneva Press, 1975), 30.

3Brandon O’Brien, “Is Patriotism Christian?” Christianity Today, accessed July 25, 2016, at www.christianitytoday.com/biblestudies/articles/spiritualformation/patriotismchristian.html.

4Trevin Wax, “Why Younger Evangelicals May Feel Uneasy in a Patriotic Church Service,” The Gospel Coalition, July 2, 2014, accessed July 25, 2016, at https://blogs.thegospelcoalition.org/trevinwax/2014/07/02/why-younger-evangelicals-may-feel-uneasy-in-a-patriotic-church-service/.

5Kevin DeYoung, “5 Thoughts on Patriotism and the Church,” Church Leaders, accessed July 25, 2016, at www.churchleaders.com/pastors/pastor-articles/152006-kevin-deyoung-patriotism-and-the-church.html.

6Wax, “Why Younger Evangelicals.”

7DeYoung, “5 Thoughts.”

8Ibid.

9C. S. Lewis, The Four Loves (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1960), 24.

10John Stott, The Cross of Christ (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2006), 243; originally published in 1986.

11Lewis, The Four Loves, 26.

12Lewis, The Four Loves, 6.

Matt Proctor serves as president of Ozark Christian College, Joplin, Missouri.

Take a Look at the Family Photo Album of Jesus

$
0
0

By Matt Proctor

One of my favorite Christmas pastimes is sitting with my kids and looking through family photo albums. Almost every picture sparks a story about their ancestors:

• “There’s your Great-Grandpa Weede. Oh, he loved to joke. One time, he painted faces on his two big farm-fuel tanks. One had a smiley face that said, ‘I’ve got diesel.’ The other had a frowning face that said, ‘I’ve got gas!’

“The whole county knew his laugh . . . and his faith. He prayed every day for every grandkid by name.”

• “And there’s your Granny Ruth. A strong, energetic lady, and the glue that held the big Bunton farming clan together. For 20 years on her tax forms, she wrote ‘matriarch’ on the occupation blank!

“But always a servant. She was still teaching the special-needs adult Sunday school class at 84 years old.”

The pages turn, the stories flow, my kids learn what kind of people they come from—the good and the bad—and they discover that God’s hand has been writing our family story for generations.

Boring List or Interesting Photos?

Judging from the Scripture readings in the average Christmas Eve service, the Christmas story begins for many Christians at Matthew 1:18. We tend to skip the genealogy in verses 1–17, afraid the droning drumbeat of forty-some generations of Jesus’ ancestors will put the congregation to sleep. It’s not exactly a gripping introduction to Matthew’s book, and besides, it doesn’t seem that important.

12_tamar_jnBut are we missing something? Second Timothy 3:16 says, “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching,” so could there be something to learn from this ancestral roll call? Could there be gospel in this beginning to the Gospel?

Matthew’s readers thought so. For his Jewish audience, the genealogy was an immediate attention-grabber. The famous Hebrew historian Josephus starts his own autobiography by tracing the names of his ancestors—Jewish audiences love these lists! So for Matthew’s readers, it is not simply an ancient record of unknown dead guys. Instead, almost every name triggers stories, emotions, or warm memories. This is not just Jesus’ backstory, after all. This is their entire nation’s history, their own personal lineage.

It feels to them like sitting on the couch with the family photo album, as dad shows the pictures and tells the tales. And what a collection of famous photos it is! On the title page of Jesus’ family album, Matthew tells his audience this is the story of the Messiah, and they lean forward to the edge of their seats. As Matthew begins to turn the pages, they can’t help but point at the pictures:

• “Look! There’s Abraham.” Matthew’s audience knows Messiah would be Abraham’s seed (Genesis 22:18).

• “And there’s Judah!” They know the prophecy in Genesis 49:10, “The scepter will not depart from Judah . . . until he to whom it belongs shall come.” Their excitement is palpable now.

• “And here’s David!” Messiah, of course, would be descended from Israel’s greatest leader (2 Samuel 7:12).

By the time Matthew gets to the last page of the album—with the photo of baby Jesus in Mary’s arms—his readers know: this child is indeed the Christ, the Promised One of God.

God Has a Perfect Master Plan

They also notice something else important. Matthew is an accountant by trade, and accountants are by nature a little
obsessive-compulsive. They like things neat and tidy. (Do you know why accountants wear gray suits? To bring a little color into an otherwise drab existence.) Accountants deal in numbers, and they always want the books to balance.

12_rahab_jnSo it’s not surprising—his audience notes—that Matthew has divided his genealogical photo album into three perfectly ordered sections, 14 generational pages in each section.

But Matthew is also a preacher, and this careful arrangement is not just an attempt to compulsively “balance the books.” This is a sermon. What message is Matthew preaching?

God is in control.

Matthew shows his audience something remarkable. Though history may seem hodge-podge, random, and meaningless in its endless cycle of births and deaths, it is in fact under the careful guiding hand of God. In his genealogy, the organizationally oriented accountant shows his audience that there is order in the midst of the chaos, a divine plan patiently at work over millennia, quietly but relentlessly moving world events toward a single moment—the arrival of the Savior.

In his summary in 1:17, mathematically minded Matthew “shows the believer that, when you ‘add up’ the meaning of history, the ‘bottom line’ is Jesus Christ.”1

This neatly organized photo album reminds the readers that, even when he seemed absent, God had been at work all along. He is ever-present, he is sovereign, he is faithful to keep his promises, and his hand has been writing their family story for generations. God is still in control.

That’s good news.

God Has Some Seriously Messy People

But Matthew’s not done preaching, and in putting together this album, the policies-and-procedures-loving tax guy does something that is definitely not by the book.

He includes women.

Though not completely unprecedented, it is still highly unusual for women to appear in a Jewish genealogy. Imagine picking up a West Point yearbook from 1950—when the U.S. Military Academy was still all-male—and scattered among the black-and-white photos, you find four female cadets. You would be confused, even shocked. Who are these women, and how did their pictures get in this book?

12_ruth_jnThat’s exactly the reaction of Matthew’s readers. Oh, they might have expected to see Mary’s picture on the last page, but the other four ladies? Completely unexpected.

And the women he chose! If Matthew just wanted female representation in his album, he could’ve chosen the honored Hebrew matriarchs—Sarah, Rebekah, Rachel, and Leah. But he didn’t.

Instead, it’s as if Matthew has rifled through all the old boxes in Israel’s attic, until he finally dug out the four most shocking family photos he could find. These women are all tainted, and his readers can hardly contain their dismay:

“Why is there a picture of Tamar?” In Genesis 38, when Judah fails to provide her a husband as promised, Tamar seduces her former father-in-law. She ends up pregnant with twin boys, making Judah both their father and (legally) their grandfather!

“I can’t believe he included Rahab!” Yes, she acted courageously to hide the Israelite spies in Joshua 2, but that didn’t change her occupation. She was a prostitute, a common hooker.

“Ruth? OK, but. . . .” No, Ruth wasn’t like the two women just mentioned, but sexual sin still stained her family history. As a Moabite, she was the product of Lot’s incest with his daughter, prompting God to command that no Moabite may enter the assembly of the Lord, “not even in the tenth generation” (Deuteronomy 23:3).

“Not Bathsheba too!” This picture seems completely unnecessary, a gratuitous reminder of King David’s greatest failure. Why would Matthew insert a photo of the infamous adulteress—a pre-modern Monica Lewinsky?

These women are not squeaky clean Evangelical role models, like Beth Moore or Anne Graham Lotz. You won’t see them on TBN . . . but you might see them on TMZ! They’re notorious—a hot mess—and that’s why you don’t meet a lot of girls today named Tamar, Rahab or Bathsheba. What exactly is Matthew up to here?

God Uses Messy People in His Master Plan

He’s still preaching, that’s what. Matthew includes these four women—each with a messy backstory—to communicate a powerful message: God loves using imperfect people to accomplish his perfect plan.

When President George W. Bush gave the 2001 commencement address at Yale University, he began, “To the A students who are graduating with honors, I say: well done. And to the C students I say: you too can be president of the United States!” God has a long history of using both A students and C students, the eloquent and the slow of speech, the dressed-up and the messed-up, the weak and the strong (1 Corinthians 1:27).

12_bathsheba_jnYou see that in these four ladies. God chooses them to help save the world, and their contribution is not simply giving birth (as significant as that is). No, each lady is an active agent in God’s plan.

Tamar has to trick Judah into fathering the next generation of the Messianic bloodline.

Rahab has to covertly redirect the king of Jericho’s soldiers to protect the Israelites.

Ruth has to take an aggressive step to get Boaz moving toward the wedding altar—proposing to him herself!

Bathsheba has to make a shrewd, even dangerous, political move to protect Solomon’s right to the throne.2

Each woman takes some kind of risky initiative to accomplish God’s purposes and, in so doing, keeps the redemption story alive. As one scholar puts it, “Israel’s history would have been cut short prematurely had these women not seen it as their task to map out alternative pathways to the future.”3 To Matthew’s readers, these are surprising heroes, because . . .

In all four stories, God uses women instead of men. In Jesus’ day, a woman was a second-class citizen, more property than person. A common rabbinic prayer began, “Blessed art thou, O God, for not making me a Gentile, slave or woman.” In the Greco-Roman world, there were about 140 men for every 100 women. Why? What happened to the other women? They had been left to die as infants, viewed as having little value. Women were literally disposable . . . but not to God.

In the book Children’s Letters to God, one young girl wrote: “Dear God, are boys better than girls? I know you are one, but try to be fair.” In Jesus’ genealogy, God answers the question. He wants to use all of his children to do his work, not just the boys.

In all four stories, God uses Gentiles instead of Jews. Tamar was an Aramean, Rahab a Canaanite, Ruth a Moabite, and Bathsheba was a Hittite, at least by marriage, if not by blood. Though Matthew is writing to a Jewish audience, he pointedly inserts these ladies at the beginning of his book to foreshadow the message at the end of his book: God is not just out to save the Israelite nation.

Shocking as it may seem to Jewish ears, God wants disciples from “all nations,” every ethnic group on the globe (Matthew 28:19). And in the very bloodstream of the Messiah, we can already see God gathering the nations together in Christ. God wants to use all of his children to do his work, not just the Jews.

In all four stories, God uses “scandalous” sinners instead of respectable ones. Of course, everyone is a sinner, but in these four ladies, God picks some of the most scandalous sinners he can find. (Even though Ruth is not as egregious a sinner, her story still carries the stigma of sin.) The stain on these ladies’ lives is clearly visible, but God chooses messes to bring his Messiah. He wants to use all of his children to do his work, not just the respectable ones.

In August 2001, at a jazz club in New York City, world-renowned trumpeter Wynton Marsalis was playing a song called “I Don’t Stand a Ghost of a Chance with You.” The audience was mesmerized, when suddenly the sound of a cell phone sliced through air, marring the drama of the moment. A jazz critic in the audience scrawled on his notepad, “MAGIC, RUINED,” and people began to chatter.

But at that moment, the masterful Marsalis improvised. He played back the notes of the cell phone ring tone—first slow, then fast, and in different keys—and when all ears were back on him, he seamlessly transitioned the silly cell phone tune back to the ballad and finished the song. In the words of the jazz critic, “The standing ovation was tremendous.”

The message of these four surprising females in Jesus’ family photo album? God can take weaknesses—even failures—and weave them seamlessly into the song of salvation. He turns messes into masterpieces, and that’s good news.

This Christmas, don’t skip Matthew’s genealogy. There is gospel in the beginning of this Gospel.

And who knows? Someday, when a future generation is flipping through a photo album of God’s children doing his work in the world . . . maybe they’ll find your picture too.

________

1Frederick Dale Bruner, Matthew: A Commentary, Vol. 1 (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2007), 22.

2Read Genesis 38; Joshua 2; Ruth 3; and 1 Kings 1.

3R. T. France, The Gospel of Matthew (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2007), 38.

Matt Proctor serves as president with Ozark Christian College, Joplin, Missouri.

From Vile to Victory

$
0
0

By Matt Proctor

“I remember being in the bars at 3 years old with my mother singing in the bands,” says Juliet Rose. Juliet was born into addiction. Her mother drank heavily, and her dad was a drug addict.

Her mother married another man when Juliet was 4, and “that’s when monsters became real.” Her new stepdad molested her for the next five years.

ArrestShe always felt alone. “I had no friends, so I quit school in the ninth grade. I had no education, no life skills.” At 16, she fled to Las Vegas, where she survived as a prostitute. That chapter of her life ended with her beaten-up, used-up, robbed at gunpoint, and left for dead on the street.

Then things got bad.

By age 32, she had been married three times and had two children. She became “a functioning addict,” using and manufacturing methamphetamine. When the Jasper County Drug Task Force kicked down her door and arrested her—for the ninth time—on 11 felony charges, prison seemed a sure bet.

Worst of all, her boys—ages 4 and 8—were taken from her. For Juliet, that was rock bottom.

“I was broken. They took the only two people in the world who had ever loved me unconditionally,” she says through tears. “I fell on my face before God, and I said, ‘I’m sorry, God. I want my babies back. Whatever it takes, I’m gonna serve you!’”

Over the next eight months, Juliet surrendered her life to Christ, turned her back on drugs and alcohol, and welcomed her boys back home. Though prison seemed likely, miraculously all charges were dropped. That’s when she heard God say, Now I can use you, Juliet. I’m going to use every vile thing that has happened to you to serve other women.

She enrolled at Ozark Christian College, and I’ve never had a student more joyful in the Lord than Juliet. She graduated with a psychology and counseling degree, and today, Juliet leads Guiding Light Ministries, a faith-based residential treatment program for women with addictions.

I asked Juliet to share her testimony as a trophy of grace in our college chapel. When she closed—“I’ve been clean and sober for six years and three days today!”—the college family stood to their feet in a thunderous ovation.

Tears streamed down her cheeks and the cheeks of six of “her girls” from Guiding Light on the front row. Jesus had taken what was “vile” and turned it into victory.

A better story indeed.

Matt Proctor is president of Ozark Christian College, Joplin, Missouri.

An Interview with Matt Proctor

$
0
0
Matt Proctor
Matt Proctor

Matt Proctor challenges parents to seize their opportunity to create a lasting legacy through their children. Get his tips for parenting in this exclusive interview with Editor Mark Taylor at the 2016 North American Christian Convention.

10 Ways Your Church Can Move More Young People Toward Vocational Ministry

$
0
0

By Matt Proctor

1. Preach on the need for full-time kingdom workers.

All Christians are ministers, no matter their vocation. There is no clergy/laity distinction in God’s church, and all believers are called to witness, lead, and serve. “You got into the ministry when you got out of the baptistery.” May we never water down the biblical teaching on the priesthood of all believers (1 Peter 2:9).

But this too: may we never water down the need for vocational Christian leaders. Preach on the need for those who will give their working lives to leading the church, reaching the lost, preaching the Word (1 Corinthians 9:14).

I have a “road sermon” I’ve preached in many churches on Matthew 9:37, 38. “The harvest is plentiful, but the workers are few. Ask the Lord of the harvest, therefore, to send out workers into his harvest field.” Too many times, after challenging the church to raise up vocational Christian workers, people say to me, “I’ve never heard a sermon on that before.”

Remind your church that without full-time kingdom leaders, most Bible translations would never exist and most pioneering mission work would never happen. Without vocational leaders, too many churches are never planted, too many congregations never grow, too many children are never taught, marriages never mended, addictions never broken, hungry never fed, nations never reached, and souls never saved.

The harvest is still plentiful; the workers are still few. Preach the need.

2. Make this a dial on your church’s dashboard.

Every church has a set of stats they monitor—worship attendance, offerings, baptisms, small group participation, volunteer numbers—to check their congregation’s health. Add a dial to your dashboard: number of young people sent into vocational ministry.

We measure what matters, so count how many students you’ve sent to Bible college in the last three years. Then decide to raise that number. Put “kingdom recruiter” on everybody’s job description, and set a goal. As Andy Stanley says, “Clarify the win.”

For 35 years, Henrietta Mears taught the college Sunday school class at First Presbyterian Church in Hollywood, California. Five foot four inches tall, thickset, with “Coke-bottle” glasses and a deep love for Christ, this passionate woman made “vocational ministers raised” a measure of her ministry. She sent out more than 400 young men and women into Christian service. Among them: Young Life founder Jim Rayburn and Campus Crusade for Christ founder Bill Bright. Those two leaders alone represent hundreds of thousands of lives reached for Christ!

That’s a win.

3. Plant seed thoughts in the minds of potential kingdom leaders.

They might be the brightest students in the youth group, because God’s mission in the world needs the best leaders. Or they might be the C students, because God has a habit of choosing unlikely folks to make a big difference (1 Corinthians 1:27). Wherever you find them, plant the idea that God might be calling them to ministry. Say something.

Eighty-year-old D. P. Shaffer was still preaching in Conneautville, Pennsylvania, when he heard a first-grader quote a large portion of John 14 in front of the congregation. After the service, D. P. patted the boy’s head and said, “You are going to make a good preacher someday.”

That little boy’s name was Bob Russell, who never forgot those words and went on to lead Southeast Christian Church in Louisville, Kentucky, to great kingdom impact.

Never underestimate the power of your words.

4. Speak of the joys of ministry.

Yes, ministry is hard, people can be frustrating, and the paycheck can be small. But don’t let difficulties be the only things young people overhear about ministry.

Let them also hear of the blessings. In 25 years of ministry, I’ve helped a child find John 3:16 for the first time. I have held the hand of a precious saint as she passed out of this world and into the arms of Jesus. I have lowered an obedient body into a liquid tomb and brought him back up to new life.

I have stood to preach on an ordinary Sunday—with 10,000 angels leaning over the balconies of Heaven, holding their breath, 10,000 demons glaring up through the gates of Hell, human eternities hanging in the balance—and I have seen proud spirits broken, wounded hearts healed, spiritual adrenaline surge through weary souls, and final destinies forever changed. Glory to God! In the great drama of the ages, we get to play a part!

Let young people hear: there are greater paychecks than those you cash at the bank. Speak of the joys of serving Jesus.

5. Involve young people in ministry now.

Take prospective kingdom workers on mission trips. Let them lead worship. Take them with you on a hospital visit. Help them prepare a lesson or sermon. A taste of ministry may whet their appetite for full-time service.

At a megachurch minister’s conference, Bob Russell was assigned the topic, “If I Had My Ministry to Do Over Again.” He mentioned seven things he’d do differently. One of them: Bob would start a junior high preacher’s club to recruit future ministers. Not a bad idea.

When Christian school principal Larry Leathermon saw preaching potential in a skinny, smart-alecky seventh-grader, he assigned him a topic to preach in the school chapel. That junior higher may be the only person in church history to preach his first sermon on the subject of “Jesus: A High Priest in the Order of Melchizedek”! But that eight-minute, very forgettable sermon lit in his heart a passion to preach which still burns today.

That young man was me.

6. Connect them to kingdom heroes.

Our culture holds up athletes, models, business tycoons, and entertainers as heroes. Who will the young people in your church aspire to be?

Bring in missionaries to share their stories. Invite Bible college professors to preach in worship or youth group. Introduce young people to kingdom servants—at Christ In Youth gatherings and camp and conventions—and tell your students the backstory on each one. I know a church whose main hallway is lined with 8-by-10-inch photographs of each Timothy the congregation has sent out over the last 35 years.

I’ve had my own children read biographies of great saints of the past, taken them to a local nursing home to meet one of my spiritual mentors, and included them on trips to meet ministry leaders I admire.

An ancient Greek proverb says, “A people are known by the heroes they crown.” Connect your young people to men and women who have given their working lives to kingdom work.

Teenagers worship at an Ozark Christian College weekend event planned especially for them. Ozark hosts three such events each year—two for older teens and one for younger teens. The events not only help the teens dig deeper into the Word and faith, but also introduce them to a Christian college campus.
Teenagers worship at an Ozark Christian College weekend event planned especially for them. Ozark hosts three such events each year—two for older teens and one for younger teens. The events not only help the teens dig deeper into the Word and faith, but also introduce them to a Christian college campus.

7. Take young people to visit a Bible college.

Let them sit in classes, worship in chapel, and sleep in the dorm. Introduce them to college students who will share their stories of God’s call. Sit in a professor’s office or two, and let them paint a picture of how God uses Bible colleges to shape people for life and ministry.

Young people who had never considered ministry suddenly find themselves immersed in a culture focused on full-time kingdom leadership. A vision is caught, and these teenagers begin to ask, “Would God want to use me in this way?”

Oswald Chambers, author of My Utmost for His Highest, was also a Bible college professor. The purpose of a Bible college, he wrote, is “for God to help Himself to lives.”

That can even happen on a campus visit.

8. Challenge parents to give their children to the Lord.

It’s often harder to convince parents to consider ministry than to convince students. Many are unsettled when their child shows interest in leadership ministry.

“Ministry is so stressful.” “The pay is so small.” “You need a degree that will help you in the real world.” “What if you (and my future grandchildren) are called to Africa?” It’s one thing to send a check to the mission field; it’s another thing to send a child.

Part of discipling the parents in your church will be challenging them to give their children fully to the Lord. Listen to their concerns. Then remind them of God’s care for their children. Give them a good ministry biography to read. Connect them to kingdom heroes, and share the joys of ministry. Connect them to other parents who have a child in ministry. Challenge them to pray, and pray with them.

Help parents set their children free to respond to God’s call in their lives.

9. Support ministry studies financially.

West Point trains leaders for our nation’s battles, and we as taxpayers underwrite a cadet’s education because a prepared military leadership matters. The church has Bible colleges and seminaries to train leaders for the spiritual battle, and it is fitting that the church underwrite that education because a prepared spiritual leadership really matters.

Financially support the schools themselves, but also consider paying for a particular student’s education.

Lexington preacher Wayne Smith once led a young man in the U.S. Army to the Lord and wrote faithfully to him during his enlistment, asking him to consider ministry when he was finished. When the soldier was discharged, he discovered Wayne had already enrolled him at Cincinnati Bible Seminary and paid for his first year’s tuition! That young man’s name was Joe Wright, who saw thousands come to Christ during his ministry at Central Christian Church in Wichita, Kansas.

Kingdom leaders are a good return on investment.

10. Pray.

Jesus commanded, “Ask the Lord of the harvest, therefore, to send out workers into the harvest field.” Do you pray this prayer?

My testimony: I grew up knowing I was called to be a preacher. But when I was named a National Merit finalist in high school, I pulled a Jonah and ran from God’s call. I enrolled at the University of Iowa as a journalism major. (Tom Brokaw went to the University of Iowa.) I was going to make my name in the world, and that year at the university, I was a prodigal son in a far country.

The following summer, I worked at a Christian camp—dishwasher, trash collector, woodchopper—and during the evening chapel services, I would stand in the back during worship. I liked the music and thought the band was cool, but when the preacher stood to preach, I would leave. I didn’t want to hear it.

During the ninth-grade camp, the week’s preacher was an unassuming little guy named Bob Martin. Bob was not what you’d call a dynamic youth speaker, but when he began to preach, I couldn’t leave. His words reached out and grabbed me, and the Holy Spirit began a weeklong blitz on my heart.

At Thursday night’s invitation, after Bob’s message, a crowd of crying ninth-grade girls walked down the aisle to rededicate their lives to Jesus (for the 17th time), and so did one college freshman guy. In front of that camp, I repented. It was time to get right with God and follow his call. I was heading to Bible college to be a preacher.

What I did not know at the time: Bob Martin knew my story. (My hometown preacher was his brother-in-law.) He knew I was a Jonah.

What else I did not know at the time: Bob had fasted that entire week and prayed for me every single day by name.

The only reason I’m writing this article is because Bob Martin prayed me back into the kingdom . . . and right into ministry.

Who is waiting for you to pray them into ministry?

Matt Proctor serves as president with Ozark Christian College, Joplin, Missouri.

Viewing all 75 articles
Browse latest View live